2004
DOI: 10.2118/88991-jpt
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Multiple-Field Scheduling and Production Strategy With Reduced Risk

Abstract: Developing large E&P assets requires long-term commitments of capital that are tied to decisions on facilities, wells, scheduling, and production strategy. The decisions often must be made in the project-planning phase when large uncertainties exist that can lead to project risks. We present an optimization system and method that enables finding more-optimal reservoir-planning and managementdecision alternatives under conditions of uncertainty, such that the associated risks can be managed. The system integrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last two decades, the oil and gas industry has employed optimization techniques for a variety of purposes such as determining optimal well location and spacing of fracture stages, [4][5][6] field development under uncertainty, 7 resource scheduling, 8,9 maximization of net present value, 10,11 optimization of water management in shale oil and gas production process, [12][13][14][15] shale oil and gas supply chain optimization, 16,17 history matching of reservoir parameters, [18][19][20][21][22][23] and development of well and reservoir simulators. [24][25][26][27] Specifically, for a given amount of proppant to be injected, a unified fracture design (UFD) that provides the optimal fracture geometry was proposed by Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, the oil and gas industry has employed optimization techniques for a variety of purposes such as determining optimal well location and spacing of fracture stages, [4][5][6] field development under uncertainty, 7 resource scheduling, 8,9 maximization of net present value, 10,11 optimization of water management in shale oil and gas production process, [12][13][14][15] shale oil and gas supply chain optimization, 16,17 history matching of reservoir parameters, [18][19][20][21][22][23] and development of well and reservoir simulators. [24][25][26][27] Specifically, for a given amount of proppant to be injected, a unified fracture design (UFD) that provides the optimal fracture geometry was proposed by Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another notable direction in the stochastic optimisation of oil and gas field development involves the use of a reservoir simulation models. The paper (Cullick et al, 2004) describes planning the investments into a production system for several deposits with consideration of economic criteria and a certain tolerable level of risk, set up by a field operating company. The authors use finite-difference reservoir model to evaluate the properties of the deposit.…”
Section: Overview Of the Research Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goel and Grossmann (2004) addressed the optimal investment and operational planning of gas field developments under uncertainty in gas reserves using stochastic programming. Cullick et al (2004) developed an framework for the optimal reservoir planning and management under the uncertainty of associated risks. Kosmidis et al (2005) proposed an MINLP optimisation model and a solution procedure for the well scheduling problem considering the optimal connectivity of wells to manifolds and separators, as well as the optimal well operation and gas lift allocation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%