2008
DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0b013e3282f4d389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing delayed scan time for FDG PET: Comparison of the early and late delayed scan

Abstract: The retention index values in the two delayed phases have good relativity. The diagnostic value of early delayed imaging is higher than that of late delayed imaging. An early delayed scan, according to our research, should be recommended in clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many previous studies have performed the delayed FDG PET scan around 2 h after the injection of FDG [17,18,21,22,31,32] or around 3 h after the injection [16,19]; however, no optimized delayed scan time-point has yet been recommended. According to a previous study by Chen et al [33], the diagnostic value of a 110-min scan imaging was higher than that of a 233-min scan imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Many previous studies have performed the delayed FDG PET scan around 2 h after the injection of FDG [17,18,21,22,31,32] or around 3 h after the injection [16,19]; however, no optimized delayed scan time-point has yet been recommended. According to a previous study by Chen et al [33], the diagnostic value of a 110-min scan imaging was higher than that of a 233-min scan imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Recently, Chen et al [31] explored the most appropriate time for a delayed scan by comparing early and late delayed 18 F FDG PET scans. They performed first scan at the mean time of 64 min after 18 F FDG injection; the second scan began approximately 110 min after injection, and the third scan was obtained approximately 233 min after 18 F FDG injection in 80 patients with 148 suspected lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor-specific studies would be useful to assess the optimal timing of imaging for tumors, which could have differing levels of hexokinase/glucose-6-phosphatase ratio (eg, hematological malignancy, sarcoma, breast and other carcinoma subtypes). Therefore, the most appropriate time for a delayed scan should be defined for each kind of neoplasm 81 ; moreover, the method of SUV calculation should be standardized, as well as the criteria for quantitative thresholds to define lesions as malignant, for example, for the lung nodules. Finally, larger prospective studies may be helpful to better evaluate the clinical role of DP FDG-PET/CT imaging in oncology patients, in particular taking into account any possible resulting change in management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%