2008
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2008.080508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing controller location in networked control systems with packet drops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work we generalize this and allow each actuator a i , (i ∈ {1, 2, ..., m}) to maintain a (possibly) vector state 4 denoted by…”
Section: The Wireless Control Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work we generalize this and allow each actuator a i , (i ∈ {1, 2, ..., m}) to maintain a (possibly) vector state 4 denoted by…”
Section: The Wireless Control Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, transmissions in the network must be scheduled carefully to avoid packet dropouts due to collisions between neighboring nodes. These issues can be detrimental to the goal of maintaining stability of the closed loop system if not explicitly accounted for, and substantial research has been devoted to understanding the performance limitations in such settings (e.g., [2], [3], [4]). These works typically adopt the convention of having one or more dedicated controllers or state estimators located in the system, and study the stability of the closed loop system assuming that the sensorestimator and/or controller-actuator communication channels are unreliable (dropping packets with a certain probability, for example).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the few works that consider networked control over arbitrary topologies (e.g., [11], [12]), an assumption is made that there is a single actuation and a single sensing point on the plant. Under this assumption, those papers recommend placing the controller at the actuation point, so that the controller will know all of the inputs that are applied to the plant, and can thus correctly estimate the state from the information that it receives from the sensing point (via the other nodes).…”
Section: Multiple Sensing/actuation Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control all plants simultaneously, each node groups all of its (possibly vector) states into a single transmission packet. 11 Upon reception of the different states from each of its neighbors, each node updates its different internal states using the appropriate linear combinations. This enables a completely decoupled computation of the matrices that guarantee stability for each of the plants, although physically realized by the same WCN.…”
Section: Compositionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation