2005
DOI: 10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0473:oaomeu]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Allocation of Monitoring Effort Under Economic and Observational Constraints

Abstract: Efforts to design monitoring regimes capable of detecting population trends can be thwarted by observational and economic constraints inherent to most biological surveys. Ensuring that limited resources are allocated efficiently requires evaluation of statistical power for alternative survey designs. We simulated the process of data collection on a landscape, where we initiated declines over 3 sample periods in species of varying prevalence and detectability. Changing occupancy levels were estimated using a te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
209
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
209
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Stohlgren et al (1997) tested reducing a larger set of plant sample replicates in different vegetation communities in the Rocky Mountains and found that already ten quadrats of one square meter per sampling unit provided sufficient information in order to detect fine-scale patterns of plant diversity. Similarly, other studies showed that in Australia and California, most animal species that were surveyed could be detected even if survey effort within a given sampling protocol was reduced to three repeat surveys (Pellet 2008;Field et al 2005). Based on an assessment of birds, amphibians and invertebrates in Australia, Tyre et al (2003) further suggested that with current survey methods, sampling from 100 sites and pooling data over three repeats yielded accurate results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Stohlgren et al (1997) tested reducing a larger set of plant sample replicates in different vegetation communities in the Rocky Mountains and found that already ten quadrats of one square meter per sampling unit provided sufficient information in order to detect fine-scale patterns of plant diversity. Similarly, other studies showed that in Australia and California, most animal species that were surveyed could be detected even if survey effort within a given sampling protocol was reduced to three repeat surveys (Pellet 2008;Field et al 2005). Based on an assessment of birds, amphibians and invertebrates in Australia, Tyre et al (2003) further suggested that with current survey methods, sampling from 100 sites and pooling data over three repeats yielded accurate results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Research projects investigating biodiversity distribution patterns are usually constrained by limited resources including money, personnel and time (Field et al 2005;Baasch et al 2010). These constraints pose limits on the affordable sampling effort, both with respect to the number of sites surveyed and the amount of effort per site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, adding replicates is likely to be relatively efficient in a cluster-sampling context because once observers have reached a site, the cost of performing additional sign survey replicates is low (Mackenzie and Royle, 2005). In addition, other authors have suggested that completing more replicates rather than increasing sample size is particularly efficient for species with high occupancy (Field et al, 2005;Mackenzie and Royle, 2005;Mattfeldt et al, 2009). That being said, power increases with sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high proportion of zeros in the population index may also arise if monitoring effort is insufficient or the monitoring protocol is unsuitable for the target population. In this case, power partly depends upon variables that can be managed by researchers when designing a monitoring program (Field et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%