2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized structured sparse sensing matrices for compressive sensing

Abstract: We consider designing a robust structured sparse sensing matrix consisting of a sparse matrix with a few nonzero entries per row and a dense base matrix for capturing signals efficiently. We design the robust structured sparse sensing matrix through minimizing the distance between the Gram matrix of the equivalent dictionary and the target Gram of matrix holding small mutual coherence. Moreover, a regularization is added to enforce the robustness of the optimized structured sparse sensing matrix to the sparse … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the particular case of applying CS in a transformed domain (as in this work), the fundamental aspect for the design of the measurement projections is the mutual coherence between the basis matrix and the resulting projection matrix [ 17 ], which can be defined as: i.e., as the largest absolute inner product between any two columns of the matrices and . Several works have addressed the design of the projection matrix considering both random projections of the sparse data [ 17 , 18 , 33 , 34 ] or more structured dictionaries [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Cs Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the particular case of applying CS in a transformed domain (as in this work), the fundamental aspect for the design of the measurement projections is the mutual coherence between the basis matrix and the resulting projection matrix [ 17 ], which can be defined as: i.e., as the largest absolute inner product between any two columns of the matrices and . Several works have addressed the design of the projection matrix considering both random projections of the sparse data [ 17 , 18 , 33 , 34 ] or more structured dictionaries [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Cs Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to verify whether a given sensing matrix satisfies RIP. Another relatively simple property is the mutual coherence [15][16][17][18][19][20]. The coherence of matrix A means the maximum absolute correlation between different columns of A. Gaussian and Bernoulli matrices are widely used due to their entries being generated by an independent identically distributed (i.i.d.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent growing trend involves replacing the conventional random sensing matrices by optimized ones in order to enhance CS performance further [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Some conditions have been put forth to evaluate the qualities of a sensing matrix to guarantee exact signal recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the above alternating optimization algorithm does not consider the possible structural constraints of the measurement matrix itself, so the structural properties of the measurement matrix itself will be destroyed after optimization. On the premise of considering the structural properties of the matrix, the literature [19] proposed an alternating optimization algorithm for sparse measurement matrices, and the literature [20] proposed an alternating optimization algorithm for cyclic matrices, but both algorithms are not applicable to the bipolar Toeplitz measurement matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%