Optimized Route Discovery and Node Registration for FANET

A Review on Various Routing Protocol Designing Features for Flying Ad Hoc Networks

“…Table 1 shows that the different routing protocols and their outcome applied in Flying Ad Hoc Networks. Bhardwaj and Kaur [25] introduced the optimized route discovery and node registration approach in Flying Ad Hoc Networks and used ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol to improve the throughput and reduce the jitter and delay. Kumar et al [26] suggested the 3D cone-shaped location-aided routing algorithm which helps to identify the location of drones by using a positionbased routing protocol.…”

“…The designing of routing protocols is concentrated on the improvement of network performance by analyzing the network parameters such as the end-to-end delay, throughput, delivery ratio, drop rate, control overhead, normalized routing overhead, and congestion control. Figure 3 shows that the delivery rate and drop rate of different routing protocols such as ad hoc ondemand distance vector [25] achieves 90% delivery rate and 10% of drop rate, ad hoc on-demand multihop distance vector [10] achieves 80% of delivery rate and 20% of drop rate, dynamic source routing protocol [22] achieves 72% of delivery rate and 28% of drop rate, destination sequence distance vector routing protocol achieves 75% delivery rate and 25% of drop rate, and optimized link-state routing protocol achieves 85% of delivery rate and 15% of drop rate. This routing protocol examines under the Flying Ad Hoc Network simulation environment.…”