“…Notably, the reversible capacity of the Fe-CoS 2 /NC-3 electrode at 0.2 A g −1 and 5 A g −1 was about 2.1 and 3.6 times higher than those for CoS 2 /NC, respectively. Additionally, the superior rate capability of the Fe-CoS 2 /NC-3 electrode can be further illustrated by a comparison with that of some recently reported CoS 2 -based anodes such as a CoS 2 /C micropolyhedron composite entangled in a carbon-nanotube base network (CoS 2 -C/CNT) [ 44 ], CoS 2 nanoparticles embedded in N-doped carbon nanosheets (CoS 2 /CN) [ 67 ], CuS@CoS 2 double shelled nanoboxes (CuS@CoS 2 DSNBs) [ 20 ], CoS 2 nanoparticles embedded in N-doped carbon grown on MXene nanosheets (MXene@CoS 2 /CN) [ 29 ], Ti 3 C 2 MXene/CoS 2 @N-doped porous carbon (f-Ti 3 C 4 /CoS 2 /NPC) [ 68 ], and SnS 2 -CoS 2 @C core-shell nanocubes (SCS@C) [ 69 ], as shown in Figure 4 d. The long-term cycling stabilities of the Fe-CoS 2 /NC-3, CoS 2 /NC, Fe-CoS 2 /NC-1, Fe-CoS 2 /NC-2, and Fe-CoS 2 /NC-4 electrodes were also evaluated at 1 A g −1 , as shown in Figure 4 e. For the Fe-CoS 2 /NC-3 electrode, the capacity decayed from 850 mA h g −1 to 673 mA h g −1 at the second cycle, and gradually stabilized at 621 mA h g −1 over 400 cycles with a CE approaching 100%, showing a retention of 92.2% to the second cycle, suggesting the good stability of the Fe-CoS 2 /NC-3 electrode during the cycling process. In contrast, the CoS 2 /NC, Fe-CoS 2 /NC-1, Fe-CoS 2 /NC-2, and Fe-CoS 2 /NC-4 electrodes displayed relatively poor cycling stabilities, which only retained lower values of 313, 352, 432, and 382 mA h g −1 over 400 cycles with a retention of 83.9%, 74.3%, 74.1, and 67.5% compared to the second cycle, respectively.…”