2021
DOI: 10.17743/jaes.2020.0063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizations of the Spatial Decomposition Method for Binaural Reproduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The direct sound and selected reflections are then assigned the DOAs listed according to the TOAs in the passed DOA vector. In the best case the DOA vector is post-processed, i.e., smoothed and with stabilized direct sound [26], to improve the perceptual quality of binaural renderings.…”
Section: Precomputed Doasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The direct sound and selected reflections are then assigned the DOAs listed according to the TOAs in the passed DOA vector. In the best case the DOA vector is post-processed, i.e., smoothed and with stabilized direct sound [26], to improve the perceptual quality of binaural renderings.…”
Section: Precomputed Doasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next the (processed) RIR chunks are convolved with HRTFs according to the DOAs for the respective head orientation, resulting in a specific directional pattern for each point of the spatial sampling grid. To calculate the DOAs first estimated for frontal head orientation at the measurement or extrapolated position, a rotation matrix according to the head orientation is applied (see, e.g., [26]). As with the directivity measurements, the HRTF set is stored as SH coefficients at N ≥ 35, allowing HRTFs to be obtained for any direction.…”
Section: Directional Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Neidhardt et al [22,23] evaluated the plausibility of position-dynamic virtual acoustic realities in which listeners move towards a virtual sound source using either a continuous or ordinal plausibility rating scale. Amengual Garí et al [24] evaluated the plausibility of 3-DoF parametric binaural rendering using a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) procedure. Either both stimuli were virtual, or one of them was a real loudspeaker, and participants had to rate which of the two stimuli they perceived as more plausible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first challenge can be overcome by employing an array that captures room impulse responses (RIRs) with multiple microphones to characterize the directional properties of the acoustic environment. Using array processing techniques, the array RIRs are transformed into BRIRs for any given head rotation by combining them with an anechoically measured set of generic HRIRs [4], [5]. Perceptually plausible rendering from array RIRs, i.e., convincing rendering when no explicit external reference is provided, has been achieved with such a method [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using array processing techniques, the array RIRs are transformed into BRIRs for any given head rotation by combining them with an anechoically measured set of generic HRIRs [4], [5]. Perceptually plausible rendering from array RIRs, i.e., convincing rendering when no explicit external reference is provided, has been achieved with such a method [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%