2015 IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/peci.2015.7064892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of UPFC location and capacity to improve the stability using ABC and GSA algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results achieved with the GSA seemed to be much more enhanced as compared to the GA and PSO [24]. Kumar et al in their research found the performance of the GSA to be better than the ABC algorithm when the GSA was implemented to achieve the optimal location of a unified power flow controller (UPFC) taking into account the improvement in stability limits [25]. In [26] the GSA performed better than PSO and GA for the optimal strategic bidding method adopted by generating companies.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results achieved with the GSA seemed to be much more enhanced as compared to the GA and PSO [24]. Kumar et al in their research found the performance of the GSA to be better than the ABC algorithm when the GSA was implemented to achieve the optimal location of a unified power flow controller (UPFC) taking into account the improvement in stability limits [25]. In [26] the GSA performed better than PSO and GA for the optimal strategic bidding method adopted by generating companies.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Good [16] Good [20] Good [18] Good [17]…”
Section: Gsamentioning
confidence: 99%