1988
DOI: 10.1109/16.2510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the germanium preamorphization conditions for shallow-junction formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the growth interface reaches the implanted dopant atoms, the dopants incorporate substitutionally due to the epitaxial nature of the process, and become electrically active. In fact, active dopant concentrations in excess of equilibrium solubility can be achieved via SPEG (Bousetta et al, 1991;Ozturk et al, 1988;Tsaur and Anderson, 1983;Vonborany and Kogler, 1993). In contrast, if activation of implanted dopant atoms is attempted in crystalline material, substitutional incorporation of the dopant can only occur if vacancies are present, and the dopants and vacancies have enough mobility to combine during annealing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As the growth interface reaches the implanted dopant atoms, the dopants incorporate substitutionally due to the epitaxial nature of the process, and become electrically active. In fact, active dopant concentrations in excess of equilibrium solubility can be achieved via SPEG (Bousetta et al, 1991;Ozturk et al, 1988;Tsaur and Anderson, 1983;Vonborany and Kogler, 1993). In contrast, if activation of implanted dopant atoms is attempted in crystalline material, substitutional incorporation of the dopant can only occur if vacancies are present, and the dopants and vacancies have enough mobility to combine during annealing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ge has gained much acceptance as an amorphization species because it has the advantage of inducing greater disorder in the crystal structure at lower doses than Si, owing largely to its bigger atomic structure. Complete removal of damage induced by Ge amorphization is possible and has been achieved upon annealing 3,4 . However, low energy Ge preamorphization alone has not been very effective in preventing the diffusion of excess Si interstitials under certain conditions, thereby inducing TED upon dopant activation 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The defect region is produced by placing the PAI implant profile somewhat deeper than the boron profile. [3][4][5] Therefore, PAI energy was chosen to be at 40 and 50 keV and boron energy varied between 3 and 5 keV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%