2014 International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/optim.2014.6851033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of switched reluctance motor design procedure for electrical vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, e Q  JE (4) where "J" is the current density, "Qj" is the current source, "σ" is the linearized resistivity, "E" is the vector of the electric field, "D" is the vector of electric field displacement, "V" is the electric potential, and "Qe" is the value of joule losses in given calculation step. The computed power losses from the EC physic are then used as input values for HTS to calculate the temperature based on (5) and (6):…”
Section: A Used Physic Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, e Q  JE (4) where "J" is the current density, "Qj" is the current source, "σ" is the linearized resistivity, "E" is the vector of the electric field, "D" is the vector of electric field displacement, "V" is the electric potential, and "Qe" is the value of joule losses in given calculation step. The computed power losses from the EC physic are then used as input values for HTS to calculate the temperature based on (5) and (6):…”
Section: A Used Physic Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal management is important as a primary issue regarding the lifetime of individual electronic components. Therefore, a precise analysis of thermal performance during the design stage of any electronic system represents an important part of the whole design procedure [2]- [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, research has been based mainly on the design methodologies proposed by [6,19], proposing changes and optimizing the project according to their acquired knowledge and application requirements [20][21][22][23]. The main difference between these two methods is the output equation used for the SRM.…”
Section: Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to their simple stator construction and the absence of magnets and winding in the rotor, SRMs are particularly cheap [1]- [4], robust [2]- [5] and suited for severe environments [5]- [7] and high-speed applications [7]. SRMs also offer a high torque density [3] and very suitable torque-speed characteristics for electrical vehicles (EVs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SRMs have to cope with some important drawbacks. First, their control strategies are complex, due to the fringing effect and the usually high magnetic saturation level during operation [7], and need a hardware or software position measurement [4], [13]. Second, the need of magnetizing the machine through the phase currents makes SRMs less efficient than permanent-magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) and higher currents are needed to produce similar torques [5] Third, SRMs suffer from torque ripple and NVH issues [1]- [5], [7], [8], [12], caused by the discontinuous current in the phases [5], and the excitation of structural modes of the machine [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%