1994
DOI: 10.2307/4002826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Range Improvements on Sagebrush and Pinyon-Juniper Sites

Abstract: The opthnum combination of 3 range improvements was determined for private lands on Utah ranches. While many promising range improvements are available, determination of which altematives to implement must consider the total ranch operation. Linear programming (LP) makes it possible to simultaneously determine the profit maximizing combinations of range improvements and how these improvements will affect the total ranch operation. The study examined 3 range improvements (revegetation, burning, and chemical bru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Se observaron aparentes trueques de la longitud de las distancias de raices laterales entre el eje primario y las raices laterales de primer orden, lo cual puede acarrear importantes cambios en la densidad de ramiflcaci6n, costos de producci6n y posiblemente el funcionamiento de las raices. stands, however, represents a significant economic cost for many ranchers (Evans and Workman 1994). As a result, understanding seedling root development and its response to defoliation may aid in the development of improved rangeland species that can be grazed earlier.…”
Section: Journalunclassified
“…Se observaron aparentes trueques de la longitud de las distancias de raices laterales entre el eje primario y las raices laterales de primer orden, lo cual puede acarrear importantes cambios en la densidad de ramiflcaci6n, costos de producci6n y posiblemente el funcionamiento de las raices. stands, however, represents a significant economic cost for many ranchers (Evans and Workman 1994). As a result, understanding seedling root development and its response to defoliation may aid in the development of improved rangeland species that can be grazed earlier.…”
Section: Journalunclassified
“…Esta ecuación permite calcular el cambio relativo en el estatus productivo de los ecosistemas, los cambios en capacidad de carga y los productos animales derivados de ella (Evans y Workman, 1994).…”
Section: Ganadería Altoandinaunclassified
“…Es necesario señalar además que la dinámica de la población de ganado (vacuno, ovino y camélido), junto con la condición ecológica, la intensidad de pastoreo y la capacidad de carga animal, resultan fundamentales, conjuntamente con la composición vegetal, para estimar la estructura, los niveles y la magnitud de los cambios en los valores económicos de la producción (Evans y Workman, 1994).…”
Section: Relación Del Sector Con Las Variables Climáticasunclassified
“…Other potential benefits were mentioned but not valued. Evans and Workman (1994) used linear programming to assess the optimal combination of revegetation, burning, and chemical brush control for use in addressing spring forage bottlenecks on upland loam and upland shallow loam range sites in Utah. Although their approach accounted for treatment costs and the effects of treatment on the ranch operation, it did not consider the decline in the effectiveness of treatment that occurs with the passage of time, nor potential effects on water quality, stream flows, erosion, and wildlife.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson et al (1999) considered the economics of juniper control in the Texas rolling plains, with chaining used for initial treatments, and burning used for subsequent maintenance treatments. In contrast to Evans and Workman (1994), Johnson et al did consider the inverse relationship between juniper canopy cover and forage production. Johnson et al determined the optimum maintenance treatment cycle given different assumptions regarding the values of a variety of economic and biological variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%