2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-010-9579-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of protoplast yields from the red algae Gracilaria dura (C. Agardh) J. Agardh and G. verrucosa (Huds.) Papenfuss

Abstract: This study reports on the optimization of protoplast yield from two important tropical agarophytes Gracilaria dura and Gracilaria verrucosa using different cell-wall-degrading enzymes obtained from commercial sources. The conditions for achieving the highest protoplast yield was investigated by optimizing key parameters such as enzyme combinations and their concentrations, duration of enzyme treatment, enzyme pH, mannitol concentration, and temperature. The significance of each key parameter was also further v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We optimized the most efficient protoplasts generation with single enzymatic incubation and in shorter time periods in both microalgae species, in order to provide the fastest and most economically favorable way of generating microalgae cells with a partially removed cell wall, compared with previous studies on Dictyopteris prolifera , where a mixture of cellulose with other enzymes and longer time periods of treatment delivered the optimal cell wall digestion [ 34 ]. The shorter enzymatic period of treatment in our study is in agreement with multi-enzymatic treatments in Gracilaria and Ulva species [ 35 , 36 ]. Physiological and biochemical changes between the cell walls of various microalgae species rule the protoplast formation yields [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We optimized the most efficient protoplasts generation with single enzymatic incubation and in shorter time periods in both microalgae species, in order to provide the fastest and most economically favorable way of generating microalgae cells with a partially removed cell wall, compared with previous studies on Dictyopteris prolifera , where a mixture of cellulose with other enzymes and longer time periods of treatment delivered the optimal cell wall digestion [ 34 ]. The shorter enzymatic period of treatment in our study is in agreement with multi-enzymatic treatments in Gracilaria and Ulva species [ 35 , 36 ]. Physiological and biochemical changes between the cell walls of various microalgae species rule the protoplast formation yields [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Protoplast Isolation and Comet Assay. Protoplast isolation and purification were performed according to Gupta et al 23 Briefly, following IL treatment and washing, the algal fragments (300 mg FW) were chopped into small pieces of tissue (e1 mm thin) in natural seawater (NSW) in two replicates, each with 150 mg of tissue. The chopped tissues were then rinsed several times with NSW to remove debris.…”
Section: •àmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been extensively studied in many fields, such as proteomics, metabolomics, somatic hybridization, cybridization, and protoclonal variation studies (Reddy et al 2008a). In seaweed tissue culture, protoplast had been used to provide seed stock for cultivation purposes (Gupta et al 2011, Huddy et al 2013. Since plant cells are totipotent, many protoplasts can be isolated from a small fragment of seaweed thallus and cultured to produce seaweed seedlings (Huddy et al 2013).…”
Section: Protoplast Culturementioning
confidence: 99%