2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/mipro.2018.8400274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of PID controller in AVR system by using ant lion optimizer algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To confirm the performance and convergence, the simulation results of autotuning the PID controller for the CPC system are compared. The comparison shows that the proposed method can produce better results than the traditional SLP algorithm, the WOA [24] and the IPSO [45]. According to the simulation results, it can be concluded that the theoretical approach in this paper achieves the performance indices, i.e, t s , t r , M p and e ss , and convergence of the optimal autotuning of the PID parameter suitable for practical applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To confirm the performance and convergence, the simulation results of autotuning the PID controller for the CPC system are compared. The comparison shows that the proposed method can produce better results than the traditional SLP algorithm, the WOA [24] and the IPSO [45]. According to the simulation results, it can be concluded that the theoretical approach in this paper achieves the performance indices, i.e, t s , t r , M p and e ss , and convergence of the optimal autotuning of the PID parameter suitable for practical applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…At present, many AI methods have been proposed to autotune the PID parameter, such as fuzzy logic [2], [10], [19], [20], neural networks (NNs) [1], [7], [21], particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms [6], [22], [23], hybrid firefly (FA) and pattern search [8], the ant lion optimization (ALO) algorithm [24], the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) [25], cuckoo search (CS) [10], [26], bacterial foraging optimization [27], genetic algorithms [28], the cosine algorithm [29], the bat algorithm [12], ant colony optimization (ACO) [13], [30], differential evolution (DE) [31], World Cup optimization (WCO) [32], evaluation algorithms (EAs) [33], [34], gray wolf optimization (GWO) [35], nature-inspired algorithms [17], chaotic invasive weed optimization [36], [37], flower pollination algorithm (FPA) [38] and firefly algorithm (FFA) [39]. Although many AI methods have been proposed to autotune the PID parameter, the challenges of long execution time and convergence persist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hungrier ant lions dig bigger holes which improves their chances of catching prey. The ants slide down the surface of the hole, at which point the antlion consumes it [160] , [161] . Ants move randomly.…”
Section: A Review Of Various Swarm-based Motmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The, the antlion repositions itself to the caught prey's position. This increases its chances of catching another prey [160] , [161] . Mathematically, the random walk of the prey (ants) can be described as [161] : 0 1 1 Where cs is the cumulative sum, n is the maximum number of iterations, t is the iteration step and r is a randomized number in the range [ 0 1 ].…”
Section: A Review Of Various Swarm-based Motmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ekinci, Hekimoglu, and Eker [7] introduced a Harris Hawks Optimization method as a novel parameter approach to optimize the gains of a PID controller. Spoljarić, Lušetić, and Simovic [8] applied an ant lion optimizer algorithm for optimal tuning of the AVR system in a closed-loop generator control design. Blondin, Sanchis, Sicard, and Dura [9] proposed an optimized gain tuning method for the PID controller based on a fusion between an Ant Colony Optimization algorithm and a Nelder-Mead method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%