2018
DOI: 10.1055/a-0654-4867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Olive Oil-Based Nanoemulsion Preparation for Intravenous Drug Delivery

Abstract: A seven-factor Box-Behnken design was used for the optimized development of an olive oil-based nanoemulsion (NE) intended for intravenous drug delivery. The independent variables of olive oil concentration, tween 80 concentration, span 80 concentration, rate of adding of oil in aqueous phase, homogenization speed, homogenization time, and preparation temperature, were used as inputs of the factorial design. The response variables were mean droplet diameter, zeta potential (ZP), and polydispersity index (PDI). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as olive oil could solubilize more RPG than the two others, olive oil was selected as internal phase of NE preparation. The RPG‐NEs was prepared from olive oil, polysorbate 80 (tween 80), sorbitan monooleate (span 80), based on our previous report (Karami et al, ). Then, five formulations were prepared in triplicate in view to optimize P188 and chitosan content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as olive oil could solubilize more RPG than the two others, olive oil was selected as internal phase of NE preparation. The RPG‐NEs was prepared from olive oil, polysorbate 80 (tween 80), sorbitan monooleate (span 80), based on our previous report (Karami et al, ). Then, five formulations were prepared in triplicate in view to optimize P188 and chitosan content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPG‐NEs were prepared under high‐speed homogenization as described in our previous study with some modifications (Karami, Khoshkam, & Hamidi, ). In brief, RPG (0.1% wt/vol), oleic acid (0.3% wt/vol), α‐tocopherol (0.25% wt/vol), and S80 (3.2% wt/vol) were added to olive oil (7.45% wt/vol) and stirred well until reaching to a transparent solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high negative or positive value of zeta potential indicates a high electric charge on the surface of the NEs, which can cause strong electrostatic repulsion forces between droplets to prevent coalescence in order to maintain long-term physical stability. Both blank NEs exhibited negative zeta potentials in the range of −15.5 to −18.7 mV, which can be attributed to the presence of oleic acid in olive oil [15]. All formulations have high PDI value except F5.…”
Section: Effect Of Oil Phase/aqueous Phase Volume Ratiomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The surface charge of nanoparticles may impact their biodistribution. Although negative zeta potential values ensure good electrochemical stability of nanoemulsions [63,64], neutral nanoparticles (±10 mV) show lower mononuclear phagocytic system uptake and the longest circulation compared to positive-or negative-charged particles [65], which is favourable to achieve efficient drug delivery after IV administration.…”
Section: Droplet Size and Zeta Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%