1995
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/10.suppl_2.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of implantation in the in-vitro fertilization laboratory

Abstract: Implantation failure rates after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) can be reduced in the IVF laboratory using two different techniques: assisted hatching and embryo co-culture on monolayer feeder cells. A review of the different methodologies and the results gained using these techniques is reported. Preliminary results obtained in the Reproductive Medicine Service of the Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain using these techniques are also presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of protein concentrations in our samples was: 0.23 mg/mL to 6.11 mg/mL, a 26 fold range. This range may reflect variable dilution of the vaginal fluid and mucus during sample collection and expected variability in protein content due to the many changes that occur in the female cycle in response to hormones as well as differences in the water and ion content [ 29 , 32 38 ]. Therefore, protein concentration was used to standardize the samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of protein concentrations in our samples was: 0.23 mg/mL to 6.11 mg/mL, a 26 fold range. This range may reflect variable dilution of the vaginal fluid and mucus during sample collection and expected variability in protein content due to the many changes that occur in the female cycle in response to hormones as well as differences in the water and ion content [ 29 , 32 38 ]. Therefore, protein concentration was used to standardize the samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of sequential media (Ménézo et al, 1998a;Gardner et al, 1998) allows development of the embryo to the blastocyst stage, and blastocyst transfer has proved to be useful for certain groups of patients (Veiga et al, 1995(Veiga et al, , 1999. Culture to the blastocyst stage of PGD untransferable embryos provides information on the developmental capacity of biopsied embryos, the characteristics of blastocysts arising from such embryos and on the confirmation of the diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embryos diagnosed as normal females for the chromosomes studied (46 XX, 1818) were replaced in the uterine cavity of the patients, on the evening of day 3, using a Wallace catheter (1816 Edwards-Wallace embryo replacement catheter; Simcare, West Sussex, England), while nontransferable embryos (normal male embryos 46 XY, 1818 and abnormal embryos) were kept in coculture in B2 medium (Lab CCD, Paris, France) with a cell support of Vero cells (29) to evaluate the capacity of laser-biopsied embryos to reach the blastocyst stage. Normal male blastocysts were frozen according to the method described by Menezo and Veiga (30).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%