2021
DOI: 10.1134/s0869864321060081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of geometric parameters of cylindrical film cooling hole with contoured craters to enhance film-cooling effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the blowing ratio M=1.0, the arc and triangle protrusion cratered holes represent similar streamwise vorticity structures and intensities, including three vortex pairs. The flow field with three vortex pairs is different from that with two vortex pairs in [24][25][26], mainly attributed to a larger lateral span of 6D in the current study. The middle one is the original kidney-shaped vortex pair, commonly regarded as the origin of the coolant lift-off.…”
Section: Flow Fieldcontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the blowing ratio M=1.0, the arc and triangle protrusion cratered holes represent similar streamwise vorticity structures and intensities, including three vortex pairs. The flow field with three vortex pairs is different from that with two vortex pairs in [24][25][26], mainly attributed to a larger lateral span of 6D in the current study. The middle one is the original kidney-shaped vortex pair, commonly regarded as the origin of the coolant lift-off.…”
Section: Flow Fieldcontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Fu et al [25] emphasized the influence of the crater depth on the flow field and cooling effectiveness for the contoured cratered hole. Bai et al [26] further performed the optimization shape design of the contoured cratered design at two blowing ratios of 0.5 and 1.5. It was shown that an appropriate combination of the geometrical parameters could improve 17.21% at a blowing ratio of 0.5 and 101.96% at a blowing ratio of 1.5, compared with the reference model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%