2023
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2022.0214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Freeform Reversible Embedding of Suspended Hydrogel Microspheres for Substantially Improved Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Capabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method offers potential for fabricating complex structures, high construct fidelity, tunable mechanical properties to create a suture-able tissue, reinforcing cell survival through indirect extrusion-based bioprinting, reduced influence bio-inks' rheological properties attributed to FRESH's compatibility with lower viscosity bio-inks, and low costs [5]. However, drawbacks include print repeatability and precision [5], structure integrity and cell viability jeopardized by mechanical forces required for FRESH removal [8], and the impacts of FRESH support bath conditions, which have been previously studied in our work [117].…”
Section: Extrusion-based Bioprintingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This method offers potential for fabricating complex structures, high construct fidelity, tunable mechanical properties to create a suture-able tissue, reinforcing cell survival through indirect extrusion-based bioprinting, reduced influence bio-inks' rheological properties attributed to FRESH's compatibility with lower viscosity bio-inks, and low costs [5]. However, drawbacks include print repeatability and precision [5], structure integrity and cell viability jeopardized by mechanical forces required for FRESH removal [8], and the impacts of FRESH support bath conditions, which have been previously studied in our work [117].…”
Section: Extrusion-based Bioprintingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…One challenge of embedded bioprinting is the one associated with the properties of the supportive medium. In addition to being non-toxic, biocompatible, non-permeable to the bioink and its components to minimize diffusion, the supporting medium must also possess the appropriate rheological properties, as characterized by yield stress and viscosity, to allow for the movement of the needle through the medium during printing while also being strong enough to support the printed construct without movement after printing [ 364 , 369 ]. In some cases, the support medium may also support the cross-linking of the construct [ 367 ].…”
Section: Key Issues and Future Advances In Extrusion Bioprintingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shiwarski et al [ 153 ] summarized the current achievements of the emerging 3D bioprinting method called freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels (FRESH) 3D printing. Using this technology, the bioink can be extruded within a thermo-reversible support bath composed of a gelatin microparticle slurry that provides support during printing and is then melted at 37 °C [ 154 , 155 , 156 ]. Although this solution supports 3D soft hydrogel bioprinting, it is difficult to match the kinetics of gelatin dissolution and hydrogel crosslinking [ 150 ].…”
Section: Challenges Of Naturally Derived Bioinks: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%