2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4954125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of dual-energy subtraction for preclinical studies using a commercial MicroCT unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of this work was to systematically quantify radiological imaging parameters with SE, DE, and DCE techniques, and to evaluate their correlation with histological biomarkers of angiogenesis in a subcutaneous C6 glioma model. In order to obtain reliable quantitative imaging parameters, we used SE, DE, and DCE imaging protocols that were previously standardized and optimized [ 25 , 26 , 27 ]. Our results showed that CE X-ray imaging improved the visualization of the tumor regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aim of this work was to systematically quantify radiological imaging parameters with SE, DE, and DCE techniques, and to evaluate their correlation with histological biomarkers of angiogenesis in a subcutaneous C6 glioma model. In order to obtain reliable quantitative imaging parameters, we used SE, DE, and DCE imaging protocols that were previously standardized and optimized [ 25 , 26 , 27 ]. Our results showed that CE X-ray imaging improved the visualization of the tumor regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SE, DE, and DCE acquisition protocols were previously optimized and standardized for small animal imaging with the Albira ARS micro-CT scanner [ 25 , 26 , 27 ]. The radiological parameters for image acquisition (X-ray tube voltage (kV), current (mA), additional filter, and number of projections) were chosen as the ones which provided the highest contrast-to-noise ratio and the lowest radiation dose; and the reconstruction algorithm was chosen in terms of quantitative image quality metrics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imaging system we use has not been specifically designed to perform quantitative DE studies, its range of operating voltages is rather narrow (from 30 to 45 kV) and the required quantification of the subtraction process imposes demands that go beyond the normal operation of this commercial instrument. Presentation by Jorge P Castillo et al in this symposium [24], reports preliminary results from his MSc thesis work, in progress.…”
Section: Current Work: Preclinical Studies Of Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Prior image quantification and in order to obtain measurements that can be comparable among time points and individuals, details on image acquisition, reconstruction, and analysis must be observed and standardized, such as: choosing the proper combination of tube voltage and mAs to maximize CNR and minimize radiation dose [62], performing self-calibration of the imaging system to provide spatial uniformity [73], minimizing metal and motion artifacts [74,75], verifying signal linearity and measurement precision [65,76], performing a correct subject alignment, image registration, and VOI segmentation [60,77]. Then, the assessment of vascular features can be performed with qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative methods of analysis.…”
Section: Image Analysis and Quantification Of Vascular Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%