2003
DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.6.1.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Bus Route Planning in Urban Commuter Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ceder et al [24] designed a model to optimize the bus stop locations in a given route for uneven topography. Some other studies also carried out particularly focusing on urban areas [25,26].…”
Section: Generating the New Population And Go Up For Evaluatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ceder et al [24] designed a model to optimize the bus stop locations in a given route for uneven topography. Some other studies also carried out particularly focusing on urban areas [25,26].…”
Section: Generating the New Population And Go Up For Evaluatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the total cost function can be estimated by summing up E o-inc , E o-mpc , E u-ac and E u-inv by using Eqs. (4), (5), (7) and (26), respectively, to determine the optimal BRT, bus rapid transit, stations' density and locations.…”
Section: Users' In-vehicle Cost E U-invmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. In a similar study, Chien et al used the minimal value of total sys tem cost, including operator and user costs as a measure for determining an optimal bus route [9]. They developed 1203 method which applicable to irregular grid networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, to reduce access impedence, tortuous routes are constructed, although they are likely to increase both in-vehicle time and operating cost (Chien et al 2001). However, according to the GIS output of this research, the length of the optimized path is 7.8km, which has no significant difference to the shortest path (7.1km); the new optimum route meets the criteria of increasing coverage and reducing route duplication, whereas the shortest path overlapped existing routes (see Figure 12).…”
Section: Route Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%