2021
DOI: 10.1002/er.7126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and validation of process parameters via RSM for minimizing use of resources to generate electricity from a DEFC

Abstract: In this study, the response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to design the Box-Behnken design (BBD) experiments and optimize the interactive effects of major operating parameters of direct ethanol fuel cells (DEFCs) for achieving the maximum power density. The main effective operating parameters of DEFCs like ethanol concentration, anode electrocatalyst loading, and operating temperature were selected as independent variables in BBD while the power density was considered to be the response function under … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the difference between the predicted (68.98%) and experimental (66.49%) values had a 3.74% error, which was within the acceptable range (5% error). Therefore, the experimental model was accurate within the 95% prediction interval (Choudhary & Pramanik, 2021). The IC 50 of TCH produced under the optimal conditions was 1.52 mg/mL (1.37 µmol Trolox/mg protein), which is comparable to that of skipjack tuna (K. pelamis) dark meat hydrolysate (1.1 mg/mL) when optimized by RSM (Mongkonkamthorn et al, 2021).…”
Section: Optimization Of the Hydrolysis Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In addition, the difference between the predicted (68.98%) and experimental (66.49%) values had a 3.74% error, which was within the acceptable range (5% error). Therefore, the experimental model was accurate within the 95% prediction interval (Choudhary & Pramanik, 2021). The IC 50 of TCH produced under the optimal conditions was 1.52 mg/mL (1.37 µmol Trolox/mg protein), which is comparable to that of skipjack tuna (K. pelamis) dark meat hydrolysate (1.1 mg/mL) when optimized by RSM (Mongkonkamthorn et al, 2021).…”
Section: Optimization Of the Hydrolysis Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…To verify and confirm the agreement between the optimum results obtained from the model and the actual values, three new confirmation experiments were carried out under the suggested optimal conditions, using the same extraction procedure, and the results are presented in Table 5 (Choudhary & Pramanik, 2021). The average oil yields that were obtained from the extraction using ethanol, n-hexane, and the mixture were 20.52 ± 0.65%, 17.23 ± 0.12%, and 18.02 ± 0.52%, respectively, while the predicted oil yields were 20.10%, 17.39%, and 18.99%, respectively.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The actual/ experimental power density (2.76 mW/cm 2 ) and predicted power density (2.79 mW/cm 2 ) showed an insignificant divergence of only 1.07%. Choudhary et al (2021) [31] optimized the process parameters of direct ethanol fuel cell using RSM with BBD to maximise response, i.e., power density, where the key operating variables were ethanol concentration, anode electrocatalyst loading, and operating temperature. The RSM model yielded a maximum peak power density of 22.10 mW/cm 2 , which was confirmed experimentally with the optimized parameters of 2.03 M ethanol concentration, 1.14 mg/cm 2 anode electrocatalyst loading, and 79.48 o C operating temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%