11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference 2011
DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-6879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis of Climb and Descent Trajectories for Reducing Fuel Burn and Emissions

Abstract: This paper studies and compares optimal climb and descent trajectories that conform to the Air Traffic Control (ATC) procedures and minimize fuel consumption, emissions, flight time, and/or flight distance. Tradeoffs among these different performance criteria are examined. In addition, closed-loop sensitivities are used to evaluate the likely variations of fuel burns, emissions, and flight times when optimized trajectories are tracked in actual flights. In this paper, a point-mass model of conventional commerc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 This is especially true for CO 2 emissions, which are directly proportional to fuel burn. 26 Other emissions, such as NO x , which alters concentrations of ozone and methane, and the formation of contrails and cirrus clouds is also highly dependent on the flight altitude and detailed engine information, such as equivalence ratio and combustion temperature. 26 For this work, fuel burn is assumed to be an appropriate measure of the difference in environmental impact between the different designs.…”
Section: B Design Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 This is especially true for CO 2 emissions, which are directly proportional to fuel burn. 26 Other emissions, such as NO x , which alters concentrations of ozone and methane, and the formation of contrails and cirrus clouds is also highly dependent on the flight altitude and detailed engine information, such as equivalence ratio and combustion temperature. 26 For this work, fuel burn is assumed to be an appropriate measure of the difference in environmental impact between the different designs.…”
Section: B Design Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the optimal control problem formulation, the aircraft lift coefficient is normally used as a control variable together with a classic parabolic drag polar [26,34]. With this approach, the aircraft angle of attack is usually unnecessary for the dynamics integration, and can be disregarded entirely.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trajectory optimization problem is classically divided into a series of so-called guiding subproblems dealing with predefined flight phases: take-off [10], climb [11,12], cruise [13], descent [14][15][16][17][18][19], approach [20,21], and landing [22]. This decomposition is historically justified by the structure of aircraft systems (aerodynamics configurations, engine ratings) and also by the operational procedures that change from phase to phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%