2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and economic analysis of liquefaction processes for offshore units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the C3MR process is complex and requires a good deal of equipment, its energy consumption is the lowest at about 1000 kJ/kg-LNG [7]. Due to its energy-saving characteristics, the C3MR process occupies the largest market share in the liquefaction of NG, with a market share of about 60% in 2017 [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the C3MR process is complex and requires a good deal of equipment, its energy consumption is the lowest at about 1000 kJ/kg-LNG [7]. Due to its energy-saving characteristics, the C3MR process occupies the largest market share in the liquefaction of NG, with a market share of about 60% in 2017 [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper indicated more than a 9% improvement in net profit by reducing the electricity consumption by 60% and heat exchanger size by 37.50%. Jin, Son, and Lim [15] compared the economic performance of various LNG recovery schemes. The economic analysis indicated different outcomes when the total annualized cost (TAC) results were compared with the gross profit and payout time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jin et al investigated the efficiency and economic performance of an N 2 expander, SMR, and dual mixed refrigerant (DMR) processes. They discovered that the SMR has the lowest overall capital cost and payout time, while the DMR has the highest liquefaction performance and total annualized cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%