2010
DOI: 10.1108/17852951011078023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising the potential of mega‐events: an overview

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to examine the reasons that mega-events rarely realise their potential for host destinations and to suggest issues that need to be addressed in rectifying this issue. Design/methodology/approach -The paper is based on a synthesis of the literature as well as the substantial event-related experience of the authors. Findings -The key reason that mega-events do not generate the expected benefits for the host destination is that event organisers and destination managers adopt … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
51
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, more recently, studies have questioned the positive benefits from events and the equity of their distribution. Weed and Bull (2009) suggest that the event impacts framework may be outmoded and, supported by a number of other authors (Chalip 2004;Dickinson & Shipway 2007;Jago, Dwyer, Lipman, Van Lill & Vorster, 2010), indicate that a new focus with an emphasis on leveraging may be more applicable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more recently, studies have questioned the positive benefits from events and the equity of their distribution. Weed and Bull (2009) suggest that the event impacts framework may be outmoded and, supported by a number of other authors (Chalip 2004;Dickinson & Shipway 2007;Jago, Dwyer, Lipman, Van Lill & Vorster, 2010), indicate that a new focus with an emphasis on leveraging may be more applicable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies suggest that mega-events can create an economic benefi t to host cities (Gratton, Shibli, & Coleman, 2005), and that cities and countries can leverage them to improve their image and empower community action (Chalip, 2006;Grix, 2012). A focus on planning for the legacies of mega-events-what is left after the eventhas served to reinforce the idea that mega-events can be positive forces for urban development (Holt & Ruta, 2015;Jago, Dwyer, Lipman, van Lill, & Vorster, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example estimated that the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympic Organizing Committee invested more than it made to prepare for the event and ran a deficit of C$48.1 million in 2008 ("Olympics," 2008). In addition to the negative economic impacts, additional costs such as security issue of hosting mega sporting events have enormously increased in recent years after the event of September 11, 2001 and the consequences of such possible problems also caused physical protection programs in event facilities to become a critical infrastructure issue (Appelbaum, Adeland, & Harris, 2005;Atkinson & Young, 2002;Jago, Dwyer, Lipman, van Lill, & Vorster, 2010;Taylor & Toohey, 2007).…”
Section: Positive and Negative Externalities Framing Of Hosting Mega mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…www.efsupit.ro 354 increase in the media coverage during the period 3 is somewhat natural because it is quite safe to assume that both Korean national and local newspapers aggressively started to promote the event (Ritchie et al, 2009) and host city (Jago et al, 2010) as the event D-day is approaching. Particularly, as the final roster for each participating country and schedules for each sport become finalized, "fact" (27.7%) which can promote the Asian Games became available through newspapers during this period.…”
Section: Jpes ®mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation