2015
DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2015.1038292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mega-Event Syndrome: Why So Much Goes Wrong in Mega-Event Planning and What to Do About It

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
123
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
123
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than a catalyst for infrastructure or an economic boon, mega-events often lead to an overpromising of benefits and an underestimation of costs, the unequal appropriation of resources, the violation of citizen rights and the rewriting of urban development priorities to serve the demands of the event (Boykoff, 2014;Horne, 2007;Müller, 2015;Zimbalist, 2015). Thus, the relationship between mega-events and host societies is often the inverse of what promoters of mega-events suggest.…”
Section: Mega-events: From Leverage To Event Seizurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than a catalyst for infrastructure or an economic boon, mega-events often lead to an overpromising of benefits and an underestimation of costs, the unequal appropriation of resources, the violation of citizen rights and the rewriting of urban development priorities to serve the demands of the event (Boykoff, 2014;Horne, 2007;Müller, 2015;Zimbalist, 2015). Thus, the relationship between mega-events and host societies is often the inverse of what promoters of mega-events suggest.…”
Section: Mega-events: From Leverage To Event Seizurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, positive internal effects might emerge from intangible effects in the pre-and post-period such as pride, anticipation, improved social networks and social capital, cohesion, or cultural heritage (Chen & Tian, 2015, Gibson, 2014Horne, 2007;Preuss, 2007). These effects are often referred as psychic income (Gibson et al 2014;Preuss and Solberg, 2006;Szymanski 2002) On the other hand, they have to face internal and external negative effects (Müller, 2015). Similar to positive effects, negative effects could also arise in both the pre-event and post-event phase.…”
Section: Social Exchange Theory and Domestic Support For Mega Sports mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, locals may benefit from varying positive external or internal effects through improvements to urban infrastructure and psychic income (Preuss & Solberg, 2006;Solberg & Preuss, 2007). On the other hand, they have to face monetary (increased or diversion of taxes) and non-monetary negative external and internal effects such as noise, traffic, pollution, frustration, anger about politics (Müller, 2015;Preuss & Solberg 2006). Referring to social exchange theory (Homans, 1958) and rational behaviour of local residents, the balance of positive and negative effects may determine his/her support for MSEs; such support has been identified as a main factor influencing the benefit/cost ratio and the social impact of these events (Deccio & Baloglu, 2002;Hiller & Wanner 2011;Jeong and Faulkner 1996;Pappas, 2014;Ritchie, Shipway & Cleeve, 2009;Zhou & Ap, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As European ethnologist Wolfgang Kaschuba (1989: 154) argued more than two decades ago, "sportivity" as a "social pattern of behavior and interpretation" has become "omnipresent" and "taken for granted". This image still holds: runners, cyclists and other recreational athletes in public spaces are perceived as normal, and mega events, such as city marathons, are a common part of urban event calendars (Berking and Neckel 1993;Müller 2015). Practicing endurance sport is not limited to training sessions or competitions: it influences perceptions of healthy and performance-enhancing diets, affects leisure activities such as holiday planning, abstaining from alcohol or going to bed early to be fit for training, and influences social relations when circles of friends mainly consist of fellow hobby athletes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%