2001
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2001.547.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising Lai in Bent Rose Shoots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LAI between 1 and 3.5 is recommended for optimizing the photosynthetic area in the bent shoot system (Pien et al, 2001). We validated the models with our measured data, and verifi ed the lack of fi t between NDVI and LAI in the higher values; therefore we assumed that SRI was more reliable in our experiment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…LAI between 1 and 3.5 is recommended for optimizing the photosynthetic area in the bent shoot system (Pien et al, 2001). We validated the models with our measured data, and verifi ed the lack of fi t between NDVI and LAI in the higher values; therefore we assumed that SRI was more reliable in our experiment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…simulation results, discussed that the contribution of bent shoots to whole-canopy would depend on the light availability to the bent shoots and the density of bent and erect shoots of a canopy. Under low light conditions, maintaining many bent shoots in the canopy could be detrimental to whole-canopy assimilation (Kim and Lieth, 2002;Pien et al, 2001). At a single-leaf scale, the negative effect of bending on A was most pronounced at light saturated conditions (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing leaf area does not enhance canopy assimilation rate unlimitedly due to leaves mutual shading caused by clumping effect. Lower layer of the bent shoots contributes negatively to the total canopy carbohydrate balance if its leaf area exceeds an optimal range (Pien et al, 2001). As a consequence, before adopting any type of training system or pruning strategy one should consider the results of in situ researches and try to optimize the canopy architecture and morphology based on environmental conditions and plant physiological and phonological characteristics.…”
Section: Training Systems and Canopy Photosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%