2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2009.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising GPR modelling: A practical, multi-threaded approach to 3D FDTD numerical modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the forward modeling methods of GPR mainly include the finite element method (FEM) [16,17], ray tracing method [18,19], the pseudo-spectral time domain method (PSTD) [20], the fast multipole method [21], the finite difference time domain method (FDTD) [22][23][24], the alternating direction-implicit FDTD (ADI-FDTD) [25], and the symplectic Euler algorithm [26,27]. Although these methods can accurately simulate the propagation of a GPR electromagnetic wave in underground structures, these algorithms have some shortcomings with respect to efficiency and precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the forward modeling methods of GPR mainly include the finite element method (FEM) [16,17], ray tracing method [18,19], the pseudo-spectral time domain method (PSTD) [20], the fast multipole method [21], the finite difference time domain method (FDTD) [22][23][24], the alternating direction-implicit FDTD (ADI-FDTD) [25], and the symplectic Euler algorithm [26,27]. Although these methods can accurately simulate the propagation of a GPR electromagnetic wave in underground structures, these algorithms have some shortcomings with respect to efficiency and precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GPU computing has developed in various fields, such as acoustics [22], biomedical applications [23], plasmonics [24], dispersive media [25], and computational electromagnetism [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. FDTD based on the GPU acceleration technique has been applied in the GPR simulation model [35,36], but the pseudo-waves that are generated by the ladder approximation in FDTD modeling method are not considered. This study combines FDTD method and surface conformal technique and GPU acceleration technique proposing a precise and efficient forward modeling algorithm of GPR which can greatly reduce computation time and the pseudo-waves that are generated by the ladder approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). The GPR data have been obtained using the 3D FDTD method developed in [20,21], which incorporates air-soil interface and realistic antenna configurations, accurate source wavelets, truthful material property descriptions to provide reliable numerical simulations of GPR surveys. The simulations consist of a shielded dipole antenna, having a central frequency of 900 MHz, which radiates over a 0.12 m diameter, circular, water-filled metal pipe buried to a depth of 0.5 m in a dry, lowto-medium loss, uniform sandy soil of relative permittivity ε b ≈ 3.0 and a static conductivity of σ b = 10 mS/m.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in [11] the regularization parameter needed in the inversion was determined only by taking into account the expected noise level, here we also constrain it to the features of the scenario. The reconstruction performances of the tomographic algorithm are assessed against synthetic data generated by a finitedifference time-domain (FDTD) forward modeling scheme that is able to simulate realistic GPR experiments [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%