2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.01.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising conditions for tracheal intubation: should neuromuscular blocking agents always be used?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some trials reported failure rates and adverse events of up to 20% when NMBAs are omitted . This is inadmissible even in patients in whom intubating is difficult . However, in many relaxant‐free study arms, tracheal intubation has been carried out at light‐to‐moderate planes of anesthesia in which airway reflexes can be enhanced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some trials reported failure rates and adverse events of up to 20% when NMBAs are omitted . This is inadmissible even in patients in whom intubating is difficult . However, in many relaxant‐free study arms, tracheal intubation has been carried out at light‐to‐moderate planes of anesthesia in which airway reflexes can be enhanced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EditordI thank Dr Rodney and colleagues 1 for their interest in my editorial 2 and for their comments. I accept that there is a need for anaesthetists to gain experience in tracheal intubation without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) for the uncommon instances when their use is contraindicated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EditordI thank Boselli 1 for his comments on my editorial, 2 written in response to Lundstrom and colleagues' metaanalysis 3 reporting the benefits of using neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) to aid tracheal intubation. My major concern with Boselli's argument is that the research he reports is limited to ASA physical status 1e2 patients receiving high doses of remifentanil (4 mg kg À1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%