2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of solution treatment of cast Al–Si–Cu alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cu concentrations in the centre of the dendrites have been reported in the literature, but these results show some variations. Qian et al [16] and Sjölander et al [15,17] report around 0.7 wt% Cu in similar alloy with SDAS 10 -19 µm while Han et al [18] report 1.2 wt% Cu in an Al-7Si-3.5Cu alloy with SDAS around 40 µm, which is in better agreement with the present investigation. The overall standard deviation for the Mg measurements, is no more than 0.06 unaffected by cooling conditions, whereas for the alloys with Cu levels below 2% the standard deviation of the measurements was approximately 0.06 and around 0.15 for the alloys with higher Cu levels.…”
Section: Microstructure Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Cu concentrations in the centre of the dendrites have been reported in the literature, but these results show some variations. Qian et al [16] and Sjölander et al [15,17] report around 0.7 wt% Cu in similar alloy with SDAS 10 -19 µm while Han et al [18] report 1.2 wt% Cu in an Al-7Si-3.5Cu alloy with SDAS around 40 µm, which is in better agreement with the present investigation. The overall standard deviation for the Mg measurements, is no more than 0.06 unaffected by cooling conditions, whereas for the alloys with Cu levels below 2% the standard deviation of the measurements was approximately 0.06 and around 0.15 for the alloys with higher Cu levels.…”
Section: Microstructure Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As-fabricated Fine microstructure with continuous Si segregations on the grain boundaries of α-Al Coarse dendritic microstructure [18] with Si in the form of flakes [20] Precipitation hardening…”
Section: Point Of Comparison Slm Materials Conventional Cast Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the fineness of the microstructure dominates the selection of SHT times. For cast alloys, shorter times of SHT are needed to completely homogenize finer microstructures [18], but the characteristically fine microstructure of SLM parts required longer SHT durations to stabilize the microstructure and enhance the mechanical response with and without aging. Precipitation behavior in coarse-grained Al alloys differs from that in ultrafine-grained Al alloys [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solution treatment performs three roles (Li, 1996;Lasa & Rodriguez-Ibabe, 2004;Paray & Gruzleski, 1994;Moustafa et al, 2003;Sjölander & Seifeddine, 2010):…”
Section: Effect Of Solution Treatment On the Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%