2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-010-5652-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of laser removal of biological crusts in granites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in the case of laser‐cleaned sample, the reflectivity of the surface was higher than in the unpainted granite and consequently, CL value was above 1 ( CL = 1.1). Considering that in this case, OM and SEM did not detect graffiti remains on the surface, the increase of reflectivity above the reference granite could be attributed to an alteration of the physical properties of the granitic surface related to the mineral alterations induced by laser ablation and/or associated to an increase of the roughness in the rock surface …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Finally, in the case of laser‐cleaned sample, the reflectivity of the surface was higher than in the unpainted granite and consequently, CL value was above 1 ( CL = 1.1). Considering that in this case, OM and SEM did not detect graffiti remains on the surface, the increase of reflectivity above the reference granite could be attributed to an alteration of the physical properties of the granitic surface related to the mineral alterations induced by laser ablation and/or associated to an increase of the roughness in the rock surface …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 5 Laser removal of biodeterioration films from stone has been investigated in foregoing studies [19][20][21][22][23]. The action of the Er:YAG laser, operating at 2.94 m, has been tested for the removal of lichens on limestone [20].…”
Section: Page 5 Of 31mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The action of the Er:YAG laser, operating at 2.94 m, has been tested for the removal of lichens on limestone [20]. Elimination of biological crust from granite was studied using nanosecond laser pulses of 355 nm [21]. In a previous work [22], we have reported on the control of biodeterioration processes induced on dolostone by the lichen species Verrucaria nigrescens using a Q-switched ns Nd:YAG laser at 1064 nm.…”
Section: Page 5 Of 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we demonstrate the effectiveness of these methods in a particular case study using some stone artifacts extracted from the Church of Sotterra (Paola, Calabria, Italy). We applied the AFM and PLA methods jointly with the common diagnostic methods (in situ and in laboratory), in order to characterize the materials, identify the pits of their origin, detect the chemical composition of surface patina and define a strategy for the restoration and conservation [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%