2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.12.479469
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation-based modelling for drug discovery in malaria

Abstract: The discovery of new antimalarial medicines with novel mechanisms of action is important, given the ability of parasites to develop resistance to current treatments. Through the Open Source Malaria project that aims to discover new medications for malaria, several series of compounds have been obtained and tested. Analysis of the effective fragments in these compounds is important in order to derive means of optimal drug design and improve the relevant pharmaceutical application. We have previously reported a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to concerns of introducing biases from overfitting, we utilise two pre-defined algorithms from rdkit [22] instead of neural networks, to compute the QED and SA score. Three machine learning approaches with diverse architectures were explored to predict pIC50: (i) transformer-CNN [23], a SMILES-based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) model that learns molecular embeddings from a transformer encoder, and predicts the corresponding activity using CharNN, (ii) modSAR [24, 25, 26], a two-stage QSAR model that involves detecting clusters of molecules, and applying mathematical optimisation-based piecewise linear regression to link molecular structures to their biological activities, and (iii) DeepAffinity [27], a semi-supervised deep learning model that utilises a unified RNN and CNN model to predict binding affinity. We compare Transformer-CNN and modSAR that are trained on a subset of hDHFR inhibitors, and DeepAffinity with the provided pre-trained parameters to select the most accurate model for predicting binding affinity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to concerns of introducing biases from overfitting, we utilise two pre-defined algorithms from rdkit [22] instead of neural networks, to compute the QED and SA score. Three machine learning approaches with diverse architectures were explored to predict pIC50: (i) transformer-CNN [23], a SMILES-based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) model that learns molecular embeddings from a transformer encoder, and predicts the corresponding activity using CharNN, (ii) modSAR [24, 25, 26], a two-stage QSAR model that involves detecting clusters of molecules, and applying mathematical optimisation-based piecewise linear regression to link molecular structures to their biological activities, and (iii) DeepAffinity [27], a semi-supervised deep learning model that utilises a unified RNN and CNN model to predict binding affinity. We compare Transformer-CNN and modSAR that are trained on a subset of hDHFR inhibitors, and DeepAffinity with the provided pre-trained parameters to select the most accurate model for predicting binding affinity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three machine learning approaches with diverse architectures were explored to predict pIC50: (i) transformer-CNN [23] 1: The proportion of molecules that pass certain filters when sampling randomly versus when sampling using the CLaSS accepted set. More results for each individual property can be seen in Tables S2, S3 using CharNN, (ii) modSAR [24,25,26], a two-stage QSAR model that involves detecting clusters of molecules, and applying mathematical optimisation-based piecewise linear regression to link molecular structures to their biological activities, and (iii) DeepAffinity [27], a semi-supervised deep learning model that utilises a unified RNN and CNN model to predict binding affinity. We compare Transformer-CNN and modSAR that are trained on a subset of hDHFR inhibitors, and DeepAffinity with the provided pre-trained parameters to select the most accurate model for predicting binding affinity.…”
Section: Controllable Target-specific Ligand Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%