2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2012.05.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation and scaling of interfacial GeO2 layers for high-κ gate stacks on germanium and extraction of dielectric constant of GeO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, if a layer of GeO 2 were present, it would result in a slightly lower capacitance in accumulation because its dielectric constant is 4.5 compared to approximately 9 for alumina. 33 It is also possible that these surface treatments result in bulk Al 2 O 3 layers that differ in the amount of defects even though the physical thicknesses of the Al 2 O 3 layer on each of these surfaces measured by ellipsometry were nearly equal at approximately 10 nm (supplementary material, Fig. 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if a layer of GeO 2 were present, it would result in a slightly lower capacitance in accumulation because its dielectric constant is 4.5 compared to approximately 9 for alumina. 33 It is also possible that these surface treatments result in bulk Al 2 O 3 layers that differ in the amount of defects even though the physical thicknesses of the Al 2 O 3 layer on each of these surfaces measured by ellipsometry were nearly equal at approximately 10 nm (supplementary material, Fig. 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nanomaterial has a refractive index and a linear coefficient of thermal Submicron or nano-particles. On the other hand germania nanostructures have novel physical and chemical properties that differed from those of the corresponding bulk materials [1][2][3]. Glass based on germanium oxide is thought to be more refractive than corresponding silicate glass [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Component peaks at 530.8 and 532.4 eV are associated with GeO and GeO 2 species, respectively, whereas the peak at 533.3 eV corresponds to water present in the film after degradation . It is to be mentioned that relative concentrations of GeO and GeO 2 derived from curve‐fitted Ge 2p 3/2 core level spectrum of degraded Ge are 34% and 66%, respectively, whereas they are 35% and 65%, respectively, as evaluated from O 1s core level spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%