2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3136-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal waist circumference cut-off points for predicting metabolic syndrome among low-income black South African adults

Abstract: Objective: Waist circumference has been identified as one of the strongest predictive tool for metabolic syndrome. This study determines the optimal cut-off point of waist circumference for metabolic syndrome among low-income earning South African black population, in Eastern Cape, South Africa. The optimal waist circumference cut-off point was determined through receiver operating characteristics analysis using the maximum Youden index.Results: Among men, waist circumference at a cut-off value of 95.25 cm yie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
12
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
12
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A high prevalence of abdominal obesity among HIV-infected women who were N number of study participants, n number of elements in a sample, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidential interval, aOR adjusted odds ratio, P value probability value, HEPA health-enhancing physical activity, ART anti-retroviral therapy, PI protease inhibitor, WHO stage WHO clinical staging of HIV/AIDS for adults and adolescent, OI opportunistic infection not taking PIs is compatible with the findings of a previous study reporting a positive association between abdominal obesity and HIV infection with an ART regimen, even with minor metabolic side effects [24]. Second, abdominal obesity among women was defined as WC ≥ 80 cm [17]; however, this cutoff point is controversial [25][26][27][28][29]. The WC cutoff point for abdominal obesity among sub-Saharan African populations is based on the cutoff point obtained from studies conducted among European populations [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A high prevalence of abdominal obesity among HIV-infected women who were N number of study participants, n number of elements in a sample, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidential interval, aOR adjusted odds ratio, P value probability value, HEPA health-enhancing physical activity, ART anti-retroviral therapy, PI protease inhibitor, WHO stage WHO clinical staging of HIV/AIDS for adults and adolescent, OI opportunistic infection not taking PIs is compatible with the findings of a previous study reporting a positive association between abdominal obesity and HIV infection with an ART regimen, even with minor metabolic side effects [24]. Second, abdominal obesity among women was defined as WC ≥ 80 cm [17]; however, this cutoff point is controversial [25][26][27][28][29]. The WC cutoff point for abdominal obesity among sub-Saharan African populations is based on the cutoff point obtained from studies conducted among European populations [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This prevalence is lower than the prevalence shown in South African coloured participants in the Erasmus et al (2011) [ 33 ] study, but higher than the prevalence shown in black (9.5% for females and 6.8% for males) North West residents participating in the Hoebel et al (2011) [ 32 ] study. Additionally, overall participants in the current study had a higher MetS prevalence than that reported in low-income black South Africans in the study by Owolabi et al [ 40 ]. However, males in the current study had a lower MetS prevalence than males in Owolabi et al’s study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…[34][35][36][37] In the African population the waist circumference is a crucial determinant factor of MetS. 38 Females are seldom allowed to do physical exercise in Ethiopia. They are supposed to stay home, look after children, and take care of household chores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%