2018 6th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (IcRoM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icrom.2018.8657506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Trajectory Design for Conflict Resolution and Collision Avoidance of Flying Robots using Radau-Pseudo Spectral Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A method for trajectory planning of multiple flying robots in decentralized manner is presented by (A. Kosari and M. M. Teshnizi, 2018) .A method for collision avoidance in line follower multiple robots by using IR sensors is presented by (M. M. Almasri et al, 2016;V. Singhal et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method for trajectory planning of multiple flying robots in decentralized manner is presented by (A. Kosari and M. M. Teshnizi, 2018) .A method for collision avoidance in line follower multiple robots by using IR sensors is presented by (M. M. Almasri et al, 2016;V. Singhal et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, many force field methods, like the optimized path planning-based approach of the 3D vector field histogram [27] are predominantly suited for rotary-wing UAVs and may not translate well to fixed-wing UAV scenarios. While path planning-based methods offer high accuracy, some of them, like combining differential game problems with tree-based path planning [28], utilizing reinforcement learning for UAV guidance [29], optimizing flight trajectory with a bank-turn mechanism [30], employing the Radau-pseudospectral approach [31], applying probabilistic methods in collision detection [32], or generating an automated distributed policy for multi-robot motion planning [33], may face significant computational challenges when implemented in real time for small UAVs. Analytical formulations such as the speed approach [34] and the use of buffered Voronoi Cells for path planning [35], though computationally efficient, may lack intuitive understanding and require specialized expertise to implement effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses the idea of optimal control to transfer the collision avoidance problem into a collision-free trajectory planning problem. [18][19][20][21] This kind of methods can yield an optimal result but require a large amount of calculation. Many different optimization algorithms, such as mixed integer linear programming (MILP), [22][23][24] sequential convex programming (SCP), 25,26 rolling optimization algorithm, and model predictive control (MPC), [27][28][29] have been applied to effectively reduce the computational complexity of the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%