2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31753-3_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Training and Efficient Model Selection for Parameterized Large Margin Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By training SVDD models for each fault type, they extended similar idea to a chiller fault diagnosis strategy in [32]. Noticing that training a one-class classification model for each specific 60 fault type is computationally costly, an alternative method is to formulate the FDD issue directly as a multi-class classification problem. To list a few, Du A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t Compared with previous building FDD works, this paper presents its contributions in several ways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By training SVDD models for each fault type, they extended similar idea to a chiller fault diagnosis strategy in [32]. Noticing that training a one-class classification model for each specific 60 fault type is computationally costly, an alternative method is to formulate the FDD issue directly as a multi-class classification problem. To list a few, Du A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t Compared with previous building FDD works, this paper presents its contributions in several ways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Driven by the superiority in revealing the underlying patterns and correlations among features over traditional model-based methods, a wide range of supervised pattern classification techniques have been explored in the building FDD field. To list a few, existing literature includes multivariate regression models [5], Bayes classifiers [6], neural networks (NN) [7,8], linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [3], Gaussian mixture models [9], support vector machines (SVM) [10,11], and tree-structured learning method [12,13]. However, supervised data-driven FDD methods have limited usefulness in practice due to the following factors:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the traditional model-based methods [7]- [9], data-driven FDD method is becoming more and more popular due to its superiority in revealing the underlying patterns and relationships [10]- [12]. As a result, a wide range of pattern classification techniques have been explored as data-driven methods in the building FDD field, including multivariate regression models [13], Bayes classifiers [14], neural networks (NNs) [15], linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [16], Gaussian mixture models [17], support vector data description [18], [19], support vector machines [20], [21], and tree-structured learning method [22], [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%