1994
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4485(94)90092-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal toolpath pattern identification for single island, sculptured part rough machining using fuzzy pattern analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feed rate clustering was introduced to improve machining productivity. The use of the cutting force prediction model led to 4 to 16 percent reduction of machining time, which translated into increased productivity and better loading on the machine tool. An analysis of the machine process model showed that the cutting force model produces conservative results due to the preferred over prediction on cutting force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Feed rate clustering was introduced to improve machining productivity. The use of the cutting force prediction model led to 4 to 16 percent reduction of machining time, which translated into increased productivity and better loading on the machine tool. An analysis of the machine process model showed that the cutting force model produces conservative results due to the preferred over prediction on cutting force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating various machining constraints, such as tool breakage and chatter, the maximum instantaneous cutting volume is maintained through out the machining process with the optimal machining parameters. The considered machining parameters include the tool path pattern, depth of cut, cross cutting depth, and feed rate [3][4][5][6]. The approach can significantly improve the productivity of sculptured part machining, ranging from 15-45 percent.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 With this cutting tool, the productivity of the process is improved, the machining time is reduced, and good surface finishes are obtained for planar surfaces. 19,[22][23][24] This type of tool is mostly used in three-axis machining centers during the manufacturing of prismatic components with planar surfaces. Nevertheless, it is possible to process complex surfaces depending on the chosen toolpath.…”
Section: Cutting Tool Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stage of the process is based on a high rate of material removal that has a significant effect on the machining time, especially for relative medium/large parts. [19][20][21] A parallel toolpath and planar cutting tool are used, as these types of cutting tool are recommended for the rough machining stage. 19,[22][23][24] The methodology is applied first to a mirror cover and then to other three automotive components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many types of path patterns have been developed for AM, as summarized in Table 1 [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. It is found that the essential step to generate paths is offsetting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%