2019
DOI: 10.1257/mac.20160365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Taxation with Risky Human Capital

Abstract: We study optimal tax policies in a life-cycle economy with permanent ability differences and risky human capital investments that have both an unobservable component, learning effort, and an observable component, schooling. The optimal policies balance redistribution across agents, insurance against human capital shocks, and incentives to learn and work. In the optimum, (i ) high-ability agents face risky consumption while low-ability agents are insured; (ii ) the optimal schooling subsidy is substantial but l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Farhi and Werning (2010) and Piketty and Saez (2013) show the optimality of inheritance taxes in models with altruistic bequests and inequality. Furthermore, Pestieau and Sato (2008), Kapicka and Neira (2013), and Krueger and Ludwig (2016) assess how skill formation and education alter the effects of taxation. My paper contributes to the taxation literature by adding human capital spillovers through an information externality and showing significant quantitative positive effects of estate taxes on welfare, wages, and output.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Farhi and Werning (2010) and Piketty and Saez (2013) show the optimality of inheritance taxes in models with altruistic bequests and inequality. Furthermore, Pestieau and Sato (2008), Kapicka and Neira (2013), and Krueger and Ludwig (2016) assess how skill formation and education alter the effects of taxation. My paper contributes to the taxation literature by adding human capital spillovers through an information externality and showing significant quantitative positive effects of estate taxes on welfare, wages, and output.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stantcheva (2017) considers an extension of this framework in which wages depend on both exogenous ability and the stock of human capital, but there is no moral hazard and no agent employs workers or trades shares in his business. Closer to the current paper are Albanesi (2006), Kapička and Neira (2019) and Best and Kleven (2012), who conduct optimal taxation exercises in two-period economies with hidden effort, and Makris and Pavan (2021), who conduct a similar analysis in an environment with learning-by-doing. However, these papers do not derive implications of their framework for long-run distributions of consumption or income, and because their twoperiod nature, 2 they cannot address how the risk borne by any agent depends on his history of productivity shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The special issue on human capital and inequality edited by Corbae et al (2017) and the volume on inequality and redistribution of the Carnegie-Rochester-Conference (2016) provide a good overview over recent research. Optimal taxation of human capital using a Mirrleesian approach has been analyzed by Findeisen and Sachs (2016), Kapička (2015), Kapička and Neira (2019), Stantcheva (2015) and Stantcheva (2017), and Koeniger and Prat (2018). Heathcote et al (2017), Krueger and Ludwig (2016), Lee and Seshadri (2019) and Peterman (2016) are examples for analyses based on a Ramsey approach to optimal taxation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%