2007
DOI: 10.1364/ao.46.001679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal sparse solution for fluorescent diffuse optical tomography: theory and phantom experimental results

Abstract: We present a method to accurately localize small fluorescent objects within the tissue using fluorescent diffuse optical tomography (FDOT). The proposed method exploits the localized or sparse nature of the fluorophores in the tissue as a priori information to considerably improve the accuracy of the reconstruction of fluorophore distribution. This is accomplished by minimizing a cost function that includes the L1 norm of the fluorophore distribution vector. Experimental results for a milk-based phantom using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incorporation of the L 1 norm as regularization functional, defined as (3.72) was studied for DDOT as well as for the case of fluorescence DOT in [Cao et al, 2007;Mohajerani et al, 2007]. For information regarding fluorescence DOT see Milstein et al [2003].…”
Section: Non-quadratic Penaltiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of the L 1 norm as regularization functional, defined as (3.72) was studied for DDOT as well as for the case of fluorescence DOT in [Cao et al, 2007;Mohajerani et al, 2007]. For information regarding fluorescence DOT see Milstein et al [2003].…”
Section: Non-quadratic Penaltiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the reconstructed FMLT images, the true targets are submerged in strong background noises. For the cancerous tumors in the early stages, the targets labeled with the fluorescent probes are typically small, namely sparse [10]. So effective sparsity-constrained methods for FMLT reconstruction are of importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the CS theory, a sparse or compressive signal can be faithfully recovered from far fewer samples or measurements [12]. Considering that in the practical applications of FMT, the fluorescent sources are usually sparse because the fluorescent probes used in FMT are designed to locate the specific areas of interest such as tumors or cancerous tissues, which are usually small and sparse compared to the entire reconstruction domain [13]. Hence, the problem of FMT can be regarded as a sparse reconstruction problem and the fluorescent source distribution can be recovered by using sparse-type regularization (L0-norm and L1-norm) strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the problem of FMT can be regarded as a sparse reconstruction problem and the fluorescent source distribution can be recovered by using sparse-type regularization (L0-norm and L1-norm) strategies. Inspired by the ideas behind the CS theory, several algorithms incorporated with L1-norm regularization have been proposed to solve the optical tomography problems in recent years [10,[13][14][15][16][17]. To preserve the sparsity of the fluorescent sources, an iteratively reweighted scheme based approach, which was able to obtain more reasonable and satisfactory results compared with the Tikhonov method was proposed [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%