2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal sizing and sensitivity analysis of a battery-supercapacitor energy storage system for electric vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of them represent different methods of solar energy storage. The latest literature shows different ways of battery storage, both utilityscale [47] or small scale as home batteries [48] or mobile batteries used in electric vehicles [49]. Naturally, these storage methods may refer to the energy storage from both solar and wind power plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of them represent different methods of solar energy storage. The latest literature shows different ways of battery storage, both utilityscale [47] or small scale as home batteries [48] or mobile batteries used in electric vehicles [49]. Naturally, these storage methods may refer to the energy storage from both solar and wind power plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three weighting parameters Q 2,∆D , Q 2,SOA , and Q 2,loss are set according to industrial average prices for lithium-ion batteries, ultracapacitors, and energy from the electrical grid [46,47], such that the battery aging, ultracapacitor aging, and energy loss terms are all equally weighted based on their real-world values. Then, the remaining term Q 2,SOC is used to tune the strategy.…”
Section: Dynamic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, we can consider that battery and UC components use the pricing of reference [50] rather than [46] while maintaining V nrg = $0.1067/kWh; the increased battery and ultracapacitor prices from [50] result in a payback time of 6.9 years for the N pc = 10 UC and 13.7 years for the N pc = 100 UC. On the other hand, the component prices of [51] would indicate that the HESS is not beneficial under any circumstance.…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [8], HESSs of battery-SC were used with four different semi-active topologies, while SC size was optimized by dynamic programming (DP) approach. HESS sizing optimization and complete analysis for battery-SC HESS using DP approach to minimize vehicle lifetime costs was also presented in [9]. It refers to the main factor affects the EV cost is battery degradation whose impact index reaches to 89% of HESS costs among eight sensitive factors: driving cycle, driving range, HESS topology, bus voltage, DC/DC conversion efficiency, battery price, SC price and DC/DC converter price.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%