2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-012-0051-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Short-term Reservoir Operation with Integrated Long-term Goals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to long-term streamflow forecasts [Tucci et al, 2003], the accuracy of short-term streamflow forecasts is much higher because the forecast horizon is shorter [Regonda et al, 2013;Zealand et al, 1999], resulting in a less biased and more reliable optimized release strategy. However, due to the short time horizon, the short-term operation strategy is unable to attain the long-term operation goal unless long-term operational information is incorporated [Sreekanth et al, 2012]. Using an optimal long-term operation strategy to guide the short-term operation strategy is the conventional way to ensure that the longterm operation goal is met [Becker et al, 1976;Georgakakos et al, 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to long-term streamflow forecasts [Tucci et al, 2003], the accuracy of short-term streamflow forecasts is much higher because the forecast horizon is shorter [Regonda et al, 2013;Zealand et al, 1999], resulting in a less biased and more reliable optimized release strategy. However, due to the short time horizon, the short-term operation strategy is unable to attain the long-term operation goal unless long-term operational information is incorporated [Sreekanth et al, 2012]. Using an optimal long-term operation strategy to guide the short-term operation strategy is the conventional way to ensure that the longterm operation goal is met [Becker et al, 1976;Georgakakos et al, 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches relying on MPC are the most efficient to derive operation decisions at finer time scales (Galelli et al, 2014;Pianosi & Soncini-Sessa, 2009); while a priori approaches or rule inference provide stable conditional operating rules that better suit water systems with multiple competing users and complex decision-making processes (Labadie, 2004;Lund et al, 2017;Oliveira & Loucks, 1997). Methodological approaches to combine real-time (short-term) and long-term operation goals have been developed in the literature including: (a) prescribing final state boundary conditions and constraints to MPC (e.g., Becker & Yeh, 1974;Sreekanth et al, 2012); (b) using cost or benefit functions associated to the terminal system state of MPC, defined either by empirical experimentation or by optimization models working at larger time scales (e.g., Côté & Leconte, 2015;Faber & Stedinger, 2001;Ficchì et al, 2015;Kelman et al, 1990); and (c) employing variable time steps (e.g., Raso & Malaterre, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas linear and non-linear classical optimization techniques were used in the early days, there is an increasing trend in the use of heuristic optimization techniques often based on evolutionary principles. These include single and multiobjective genetic algorithms (Bhattacharjya and Datta 2005;Qahman et al 2005;Dhar and Datta 2009a, b, c;Sreekanth and Datta 2011c;Sreekanth et al 2012;Sreekanth 2012) simulated annealing (Roa et al 2004a,b), evolutionary simplex schemes (Kourakos and Mantoglou 2009), elitist ant colony optimization (Ataie-Ashtiani and Ketabchi 2011) and particle swarm optimization (Gaur et al 2011). A comprehensive diagnostic assessment of the evolutionary multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for water resources can be found in Reed et al (2013).…”
Section: Simulation Optimization By External Linkingmentioning
confidence: 99%