García-Arostegui, J.; Molina González, JL.; Pulido-Velazquez, M. (2015). Assessment of future groundwater recharge in semi-arid regions under climate change scenarios (Serral-Salinas aquifer, SE Spain). Could increased rainfall variability increase the recharge rate?. Hydrological Processes. 29 (6)
AbstractThe projected impact of climate change on groundwater recharge is a challenge in hydrogeological research because substantial doubts still remain, particularly in arid and semiarid zones. We present a methodology to generate future groundwater recharge scenarios using available information about regional climate change projections developed in European Projects.It involves an analysis of Regional Climate Model (RCM) simulations and a proposal for ensemble models to assess the impacts of climate change. Future rainfall and temperature series are generated by modifying the mean and standard deviation of the historical series in accordance with estimates of their change provoked by climate change. Future recharge series will be obtained by simulating these new series within a continuous balance model of the aquifer. The proposed method is applied to the Serral-Salinas Aquifer, located in a semi-arid zone of SE Spain. The results show important differences depending on the RCM used. Differences are also observed between the series generated by imposing only the changes in means or also in standarddeviations. An increase in rainfall variability, as expected under future scenarios, could increase recharge rates for a given mean rainfall because the number of extreme events increases., For some RCMs, the simulations predict total recharge increases over the historical values, even though climate change would produce a reduction in the mean rainfall and an increased mean temperature A method based on a multi-objective analysis is proposed to provide ensemble predictions which give more value to the information obtained from the best calibrated models.The ensemble of predictions estimates a reduction in mean annual recharge of 14% for the scenario A2 and 58% for the scenario A1B. Lower values of future recharge are obtained if only the change in the mean is imposed.
Although many recent studies have quantified the potential effects of climate change on water resource systems, we face now the challenge of developing methods for assessing and selecting climate change adaptation options. This paper presents a method for assessing impacts and adaptation strategies to global change in a river basin system at different temporal horizons using a hydro-economic model. First, a multi-objective analysis selects climate change projections based on the fitting of the climate models to the historical conditions for the control period. Inflows for climate change scenarios are generated using calibrated rainfall-runoff models, perturbing observed meteorological time series according to the projected anomalies in mean and standard deviation. Demands are projected for the different scenarios and characterized using economic demand curves. With the new water resource and demand scenarios, the impact of global change on system performance is assessed using a hydro-economic model with reliability and economic indices. A new Economic Loss Index is defined to assess the economic equity of the system. Selected adaptation strategies are simulated to compare performance with the business-asusual scenario. The approach is applied to the Jucar river water resource system, in eastern Spain, using climate projections from the EU ENSEMBLES project. Results show that the system is vulnerable to global change, especially in the long-term, and that adaptation actions can save between 3 and 65 M€/year.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.