1996
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1996)122:9(793)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Regional Scheduling of Solid Waste Systems. II: Model Solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimizing the haul, transfer and final disposal of MSW through mathematical programming has been a typical optimization problem since the 1970s, when emphasis was given to determining the optimum collection routes (Truitt et al, 1969) as well as to determining facility locations and capacities (Esmaili, 1972;Kirka and Erkip, 1988;Or and Curi, 1993). In addition, optimizing a MSW management system that includes waste processing, such as incineration and recycling, in addition to simple collection-haul-transfer-disposal, has also been tackled extensively in the literature (Gottinger, 1986;Anex et al, 1996;Everett and Modak, 1996;Modak and Everett, 1996;Badran and El-Haggar, 2006). Optimization models on solid waste management have been based on linear programming, mixed integer and linear programming, mixed integer and non-linear programming and multi-objective programming (Chang and Wei, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Optimizing the haul, transfer and final disposal of MSW through mathematical programming has been a typical optimization problem since the 1970s, when emphasis was given to determining the optimum collection routes (Truitt et al, 1969) as well as to determining facility locations and capacities (Esmaili, 1972;Kirka and Erkip, 1988;Or and Curi, 1993). In addition, optimizing a MSW management system that includes waste processing, such as incineration and recycling, in addition to simple collection-haul-transfer-disposal, has also been tackled extensively in the literature (Gottinger, 1986;Anex et al, 1996;Everett and Modak, 1996;Modak and Everett, 1996;Badran and El-Haggar, 2006). Optimization models on solid waste management have been based on linear programming, mixed integer and linear programming, mixed integer and non-linear programming and multi-objective programming (Chang and Wei, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.11.004 the potential marketing of recyclable materials are often included in the overall cost. A classic generic MSW management optimization model had been presented by Modak and Everett (1996) and Everett and Modak (1996), where overall cost was the minimizable parameter. Fabbricino (2001) and Badran and El-Haggar (2006) have also minimized overall cost in their studies, whilst Minor and Jacobs (1994) have used mathematical optimization to site solid waste landfills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costs are divided into three categories: transportation costs, facility and running costs, and revenues 6,7 .…”
Section: Model Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, waste stream of rejects from a processing facility to conversion or disposal facility is ignored, because it has no significant effect. Typical haul costs are in the range from 0.07 to 0.21 US$ km -1 ton -1 for collection vehicles, while transporting waste by transfer trailers reduces costs to 0.03 to 0.10 US$ km -1 ton -1 [2]. Population of Turkey is 67,844,903 according to Census 2000 [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%