2011
DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjr043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Price Setting With Observation and Menu Costs

Abstract: for their comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
183
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
19
183
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the likelihood that a firm changes its price in a period is greater the longer it has kept its price constant. This stands in contrast to most empirical studies, but is consistent with the DSGE model with menu costs (see e.g., Alvarez et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This means that the likelihood that a firm changes its price in a period is greater the longer it has kept its price constant. This stands in contrast to most empirical studies, but is consistent with the DSGE model with menu costs (see e.g., Alvarez et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We find that the fraction of prices that change from one period to the next is not highly correlated with inflation, but the average magnitude of changes does exhibit a strong correlation with inflation. However, in contrast to most empirical studies, but in a manner consistent with the theoretical models of Sheedy (2010) and Alvarez et al (2011), the hazard function of price changes is upward sloping. Menu costs, although calibrated in line with the estimations of Nakamura and Steinsson (2008), prove to be too high, and reduce the frequency of price changes considerably below the estimates from the field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 45%
See 3 more Smart Citations