2017
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2017.2671363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Power Splitting in Two-Way Decode-and-Forward Relay Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, where g 1 and g 2 represent the Rayleigh fading following distribution with zero mean and unit variance [40], [41]. The notations d 1R and d 2R denote the distances between S 1 − R k and S 2 − R k , respectively.…”
Section: Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where g 1 and g 2 represent the Rayleigh fading following distribution with zero mean and unit variance [40], [41]. The notations d 1R and d 2R denote the distances between S 1 − R k and S 2 − R k , respectively.…”
Section: Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming perfect knowledge of the channel state information (CSI), the terminals S 1 and S 2 can remove the self interference by eliminating their own signals (i.e. x 1,b at S 1 and x 2,b at S 2 ) [37], [38]. Note that CSI estimation can be perfectly known at the terminals using training-based channel estimation [39]- [41].…”
Section: A Data Rate Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, refs. [22][23][24] extended previous works by investigating multiple EH relays in both amplify-and-forward (AF) and decode-and-forward (DF) protocols. After that, refs.…”
Section: Of 15mentioning
confidence: 90%