2015
DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2014.981319
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Placement of Phasor Measurement Units with Linear and Non-linear Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same method considering conventional measurements is developed in Esmaili et al 24 Zero injection redundancy limitation and global optimal solution considering mutual buses are presented in Khajeh et al 25 Chakrabarti et al 26 propose an integer quadratic programming approach. 29,30 In Almunif and Fan, 31 MILP and NLP comparison is conducted using a simple system, and limitation of zero injection formulation for NLP is discussed. 27 Nonlinear programming (NLP) formulations are introduced in Theodorakatos et al 28 This type of formulations has been explored under several contingencies in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same method considering conventional measurements is developed in Esmaili et al 24 Zero injection redundancy limitation and global optimal solution considering mutual buses are presented in Khajeh et al 25 Chakrabarti et al 26 propose an integer quadratic programming approach. 29,30 In Almunif and Fan, 31 MILP and NLP comparison is conducted using a simple system, and limitation of zero injection formulation for NLP is discussed. 27 Nonlinear programming (NLP) formulations are introduced in Theodorakatos et al 28 This type of formulations has been explored under several contingencies in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Nonlinear programming (NLP) formulations are introduced in Theodorakatos et al 28 This type of formulations has been explored under several contingencies in literature. 29,30 In Almunif and Fan, 31 MILP and NLP comparison is conducted using a simple system, and limitation of zero injection formulation for NLP is discussed. However, zero injection formulation in nonlinear programming-based PMU placement has not been properly solved in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][24][25][26] accounted PMUs at every bus are the same cost, so the objective function of the minimum cost of PMUs corresponds to the minimum number of PMUs. However given the fact that, the cost corresponding to different PMUs are different due to the number of channels of each bus is not the same.…”
Section: Object Function For Full Network Observabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common goal of placement method is to achieve the PSO by using the minimal number of PMUs in order the minimum cost. Integer linear programming is one of the dominant mathematical optimization technique, which is commonly used for solving effectively [1][2][3][4][5]. Heuristic and meta-heuristic search algorithms also have been attracted a lot of concerns in solving the PMU placement problem due to their good characteristics [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a significant fraction of the optimization problem constraints are eliminated, the feasibility diagnosis is accelerated and speeds up the solution algorithm in finding the optimality [32][33][34][35][36]. Thus, a reduction in problem size typically translates to a reduction in total running time in comparison with past studies such as [11,12,17].The solution to such underdetermined systems is based on the Recursive Quadratic Programming (RQP) method [35]. The contribution of this work is fourfold as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%