2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal parameters study for sample entropy-based atrial fibrillation organization analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
79
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For sampling frequencies lower than 128 Hz, LZ complexity does not reflect significant differences between the terminating and non-terminating patients. This also happened when the same database was analysed with SampEn [32] and suggests that the sampling frequency should be at least 256 Hz in order to accurately estimate AF organization. Nevertheless, an important difference between this study and [32] is that the diagnostic accuracy of LZ complexity increases with the sampling frequency, irrespective of the use of a 2 or 3 symbol conversion and the mean or median as threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For sampling frequencies lower than 128 Hz, LZ complexity does not reflect significant differences between the terminating and non-terminating patients. This also happened when the same database was analysed with SampEn [32] and suggests that the sampling frequency should be at least 256 Hz in order to accurately estimate AF organization. Nevertheless, an important difference between this study and [32] is that the diagnostic accuracy of LZ complexity increases with the sampling frequency, irrespective of the use of a 2 or 3 symbol conversion and the mean or median as threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study the prediction of spontaneous AF termination with SampEn was achieved with a diagnostic accuracy of 96% [32]. In this pilot study we wanted to evaluate if that prediction could be improved with a different non-linear analysis technique, namely LZ complexity, whilst at the same time testing the different parameters that play a role in the computation of this metric.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, many authors use the typically recommended values of m = 1 or 2 and r between 0.05-and 0.25-times the standard deviation of the data [38]. However, several works have proven that these values are inappropriate for some applications [44,45]. Indeed, recent studies trying to optimize (m, r) for specific scenarios can be found in the literature [46].…”
Section: Study Of Optimal Parameters To Compute Entropy Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the context of shock outcome prediction, the VF-amplitude conveys relevant information on the metabolic state of the myocardium [19], and therefore, this normalization has not been used in this study. A systematic and thorough analysis on the optimal (m, r) values for ApEn, SampEn and FuzzEn was conducted, in line with some of our previous works [45]. Entropy measures were computed using a 3 × 20 matrix of combinations of m = 1, 2, 3 and r = 5, 10, 15, ..., 100 µV.…”
Section: Study Of Optimal Parameters To Compute Entropy Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%