2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal number of beams for stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung and liver lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 In addition, in some tissues, such as lung and liver, that have low whole-organ dose tolerances, a higher number of beams may not be beneficial, since the limiting factor is whole-organ dose as opposed to dose to particular regions. 26 It is also worth noting that in some cases, it may be preferable to have an inhomogeneous dose. A particular structure may be so radiosensitive that it is preferable to avoid entirely delivering a beam from a certain angle, or an experimental protocol may require minimal dose to particular structures, so that they may serve as a control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 In addition, in some tissues, such as lung and liver, that have low whole-organ dose tolerances, a higher number of beams may not be beneficial, since the limiting factor is whole-organ dose as opposed to dose to particular regions. 26 It is also worth noting that in some cases, it may be preferable to have an inhomogeneous dose. A particular structure may be so radiosensitive that it is preferable to avoid entirely delivering a beam from a certain angle, or an experimental protocol may require minimal dose to particular structures, so that they may serve as a control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor volumes are also smaller. Hence, a small grid size (typically 2 mm) is recommended for dose calculation [1], and at least 5-9 noncoplanar or coplanar fields should be used for conventional treatment planning [35]. Small-size beam shaping devices may improve conformity of target dose distributions [1].…”
Section: Sbrt Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective function in (4) and the constraints in (2) and (3) form the MIP as the basis of our mathematical model. We emphasize that the neighbor cuts we discuss next can be added to any MIP formulation for BAO in radiation therapy treatment planning with any objective function or constraints.…”
Section: Mixed Integer Programming Treatment Planning Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore finding the optimal solution to BAO requires an impractically long computation time, especially in case of IMRT. As a consequence, many heuristics have been developed to find "good" solutions to BAO (e.g., [2][3][4][5][6][7]. One heuristic which has sometimes been used is beam elimination, i.e., identifying and eliminating beams which are less likely to be among the optimal orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%