Only a minority of K awardees studied achieved R01 award funding during the period assessed, and a significant sex disparity was evident.
The aim of this study is to investigate p16INK4a expression by immunocytochemistry for ascites in advanced ovarian cancer and explore the possibility to predict chemotherapeutic response and prognosis. The immunocytochemical study was performed on cytology of ascites obtained from 37 Stage III or Stage IV ovarian cancer patients with measurable disease before platinum/taxane‐based first‐line chemotherapy following primary cytoreductive surgery or as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty‐one of 21 (100%) responders and 6 of 16 (44%) nonresponders showed p16INK4a immunopositivity (p < 0.001). Immunopositivity was frequently observed in serous adenocarciomas (17 of 18, 94%). Overall survival was significantly better in immunopositive cases compared with immunonegative cases (p = 0.0006). For subcellular localization, cytoplasm was diffusely positive in immunopositive cases (n = 27), 12 of which showed stronger nuclear immunostaining and demonstrated superior overall survival. In vitro expression of p16INK4a protein was also examined for both parent chemosensitive and acquired chemoresistant ovarian cancer cell lines. Chemosensitive KF28 parent cells showed stronger nuclear staining compared with chemoresistant KFr13Tx cells showing stronger cytoplasmic staining by immunocytochemistry, which were also confirmed by western blotting. Our data suggest that p16INK4a expression in cytology of ascites is a candidate marker in prediction of the primary response to chemotherapy and prognosis. © 2009 UICC
BACKGROUND.Adequate representation of women in research has been deemed essential.METHODS.Cancer research published in 8 journals in 2006 was reviewed. The percentage of women among study participants was compared with the proportion expected from population‐based estimates of sex‐specific cancer incidence, using binomial tests. Differences were assessed in sex distribution of participants by funding source, author sex, and focus of research with the Student t test, and in a linear regression model controlling for cancer type.RESULTS.A total of 1534 cancer research articles were identified, of which 661 (representing 1,096,098 participants) were prospective clinical studies and were analyzed further. For all 7 non‐sex–specific cancer types assessed, the majority of studies analyzed included a lower proportion of women than the proportion of women among patients having cancer of that type in the general population. Among studies focusing on cancer treatment, women constituted a significantly lower overall proportion of the participants in the analyzed studies than expected for 6 of 7 non‐sex–specific cancer types (P < .001). Among non‐sex–specific studies, the mean percentage of participants who were women was 38.8%. Non‐sex–specific studies reporting government funding had a higher percentage of female participants (mean 41.3% vs 36.9%; P = .005). In a regression model controlling for cancer type, lack of government funding (P = .03) and focus on cancer treatment (P = .03) were found to be independent significant predictors of a lower percentage of female participants.CONCLUSIONS.Women were under‐represented as participants in recently published, high‐impact studies of non‐sex–specific cancers. Studies that received government funding included a higher proportion of female subjects. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.
Purpose: Methods used for small animal radiation treatment have yet to achieve the same dose targeting as in clinical radiation therapy. Toward understanding how to better plan small animal radiation using a system recently developed for this purpose, the authors characterized dose distributions produced from conformal radiotherapy of small animals in a microCT scanner equipped with a variable-aperture collimator. Methods: Dose distributions delivered to a cylindrical solid water phantom were simulated using a Monte Carlo algorithm. Phase-space files for 120 kVp x-ray beams and collimator widths of 1-10 mm at isocenter were generated using BEAMnrc software, and dose distributions for evenly spaced beams numbered from 5 to 80 were generated in DOSXYZnrc for a variety of targets, including centered spherical targets in a range of sizes, spherical targets offset from centered by various distances, and various ellipsoidal targets. Dose distributions were analyzed using dose volume histograms. The dose delivered to a mouse bearing a spontaneous lung tumor was also simulated, and dose volume histograms were generated for the tumor, heart, left lung, right lung, and spinal cord. Results: Results indicated that for centered, symmetric targets, the number of beams required to achieve a smooth dose volume histogram decreased with increased target size. Dose distributions for noncentered, symmetric targets did not exhibit any significant loss of conformality with increasing offset from the phantom center, indicating sufficient beam penetration through the phantom for targeting superficial targets from all angles. Even with variable collimator widths, targeting of asymmetric targets was found to have less conformality than that of spherical targets. Irradiation of a mouse lung tumor with multiple beam widths was found to effectively deliver dose to the tumor volume while minimizing dose to other critical structures. Conclusions: Overall, this method of generating and analyzing dose distributions provides a quantitative method for developing practical guidelines for small animal radiotherapy treatment planning. Future work should address methods to improve conformality in asymmetric targets.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.