2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal multi-objective distribution system reconfiguration with multi criteria decision making-based solution ranking and enhanced genetic operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this issue, McDermott et al [21] use a genetic algorithm providing a good compromise between computational burden and quality of the optimization result. More recently, novel meta-heuristic methods based on evolutionary optimization algorithms are introduced for the same context, showing good experimental results [19,20,25,26,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this issue, McDermott et al [21] use a genetic algorithm providing a good compromise between computational burden and quality of the optimization result. More recently, novel meta-heuristic methods based on evolutionary optimization algorithms are introduced for the same context, showing good experimental results [19,20,25,26,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shuaib et al [26] implemented Gravitational Search Algorithm for minimization of loss reduction and to improve voltage deviation. Mazza et al [27] implemented multi-objective for reconfiguration which enhanced genetic operators to minimize network loss and energy not supplied. Barbosa et al [28] proposed an Interval Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm to minimize power loss, average current index, average node voltage deviation and number of switching operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms permit the transition between local optima of the feasible region, as well as a more focused search in each subspace. Algorithms based on meta-heuristics, such as Genetic Algorithms [12][13][14][15][16], Simulated Annealing [17,18], Artificial Ant Colony [19] and Tabu Search [20,21], have been used to solve the problem of EDS reconfiguration. With the same purpose in mind, Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%