2011
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2010.2056693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Inversion of the Anscombe Transformation in Low-Count Poisson Image Denoising

Abstract: Abstract-The removal of Poisson noise is often performed through the following three-step procedure. First, the noise variance is stabilized by applying the Anscombe root transformation to the data, producing a signal in which the noise can be treated as additive Gaussian with unitary variance. Second, the noise is removed using a conventional denoising algorithm for additive white Gaussian noise. Third, an inverse transformation is applied to the denoised signal, obtaining the estimate of the signal of intere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
258
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
258
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wavelet-based denoising methods (Nowak & Baraniuk, 1997;Kolaczyk, 1999) propose adaptation of the transform threshold to the local noise level of the Poisson process. Recent papers on the Anscombe transform by Makitalo &Foi (2011) andFoi (2011), argue that, when combined with suitable forward and inverse variance-stabilizing transformations (VST), algorithms designed for homoscedastic Gaussian noise work just as well as ad-hoc algorithms based on signal-dependent noise models.…”
Section: Image Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wavelet-based denoising methods (Nowak & Baraniuk, 1997;Kolaczyk, 1999) propose adaptation of the transform threshold to the local noise level of the Poisson process. Recent papers on the Anscombe transform by Makitalo &Foi (2011) andFoi (2011), argue that, when combined with suitable forward and inverse variance-stabilizing transformations (VST), algorithms designed for homoscedastic Gaussian noise work just as well as ad-hoc algorithms based on signal-dependent noise models.…”
Section: Image Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photon-limited image estimation problem is particularly challenging because it introduces intensitydependent Poisson statistics which require specialized algorithms and analysis for optimal performance. Simply transforming Poisson data to produce data with approximately Gaussian noise (via, for instance, the variance stabilizing Anscombe transform [1,12] or Fisz transform [9,10]) can be effective when the number of counts is sufficiently high [6,22]. However, applying these methods to foreground estimation is a difficult problem due to the non-linearities induced by the transforms.…”
Section: + +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of bias in variance-stabilized denoising is solved by the exact unbiased inverse [14], [7] that is defined by the mapping…”
Section: Estimation Of E{z|ν σ }mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the rather generic assumption that D − E{ f (z)|ν,σ } is distributed according to a unimodal distribution with mode at 0, it can be easily shown (with a proof and motivation analogous to that in [14]) that I f (D) and V f (D) are maximum-likelihood estimates of E{z|ν,σ } and ν, respectively. We refer the reader to [14] for further details about this form of inversion.…”
Section: Maximum-likelihood Interpretation Of I F and V Fmentioning
confidence: 99%